Home Blog

BIG WIN FOR GEEPARK FIRM IN SH563 MILLION DISPUTE.

By Sam Alfan.

Big Win for GeePark Ltd and Parksons Packaging E.A Ltd as Appellate Court Suspends Rent Deposit Orders in Sh563 Million Dispute

GeePark Limited and Parksons Packaging E.A Limited have scored a significant legal victory after the Court of Appeal suspended orders that required them to deposit disputed rent from a Sh563 million property—acquired through auction—into a joint account.

Appellate Court Judges Weldon Korir, Prof. Joel Ngugi, and George Odunga set aside the High Court’s directive that had compelled the two companies to deposit rent collected from the property into a joint account shared with Kigio Group Company Limited.

“The order of the High Court Judge Moses Ado dated 24th July 2025, requiring the applicants to deposit into escrow all rents collected from 4th September 2023 to the date of that ruling, is hereby stayed pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal,” ruled the appellate judges.

However, the court maintained the order that all future rents be deposited into a joint interest-bearing account in the names of the advocates for GeePark Ltd, Parksons Packaging E.A Ltd, and Kigio Group Co. Ltd. This directive will take effect from the date of the ruling, with a slight variation in timing.

The ruling comes after GeePark and Parksons moved to the appellate court to challenge the earlier High Court order.

The legal battle stems from the contested sale of the Thika Business Centre, a commercial complex located on L.R. Nos. 4953/IV/45 and 46, Thika Municipality. The property was auctioned publicly on 25 May 2021.

Housing Finance Company of Kenya (HFCK), acting under its statutory power of sale, instructed Garam Auctioneers to sell the property. GeePark Ltd emerged as the highest bidder with a bid of Sh563 million and promptly paid the required 10% deposit (Sh56.3 million).

A certificate of sale was issued in favour of GeePark Ltd and Parksons Packaging E.A Ltd.

However, the transaction was challenged by Kigio Group Company Ltd, the chargor of the property, which obtained interim court orders purporting to stay the transfer. These orders were served at 2:17 p.m. on the day of the auction—after the fall of the hammer.

Kigio Group subsequently filed an application in the High Court to restrain HFCK from completing the transfer of the property to the two companies.

In a ruling delivered in November 2024, Justice Nixon Sifuna held that the equity of redemption was extinguished at the fall of the hammer and upheld the validity of the auction.

“This Court also found that Kigio had failed to demonstrate that HFCK was served with, or was aware of, the restraining order before the auction,” the judges noted.

In a separate matter, GeePark and Parksons sought injunctive relief concerning the rental income from the property, arguing that as purchasers at a public auction, they were entitled to the rent, which HFCK had continued to collect.

In September 2023, Justice Josephine Mong’are granted their application, issuing a mandatory injunction directing that all rent be paid into the applicants’ account. The judge also ruled that historical rent arrears—amounting to over Sh177 million—be applied to offset the companies’ loan obligations to HFCK.

Kigio Group, not having been a party to those proceedings, later challenged Justice Mong’are’s orders.

Please follow and like us:

LABOUR COURT FREEZES POLICE RECRUITMENT.

By Sam Alfan.

The Employment and Labour Relations Court has stopped the police recruitment exercise, delaying the hopes of 10,000 young men and women from joining the force.

Lady Justice Hellen Wasilwa issued an interim conservatory order suspending the recruitment following an application filed on September 30, 2025 by politician and businessman Harun Mwau.

The court froze the recruitment process, pending the determination of the case, which questions the powers of the National Police Service Commission to conduct the exercise.

Justice Wasilwa further fixed the matter for mention on October 21, 2025, to confirm compliance and for highlighting of submissions.

The Commission (NPSC) advertised the recruitment of 10,000 police officers on September 19, 2025, following a long-standing standoff with the National Police Service (NPS).

In a notice published in a local daily, the commission invited interested and qualified applicants to download recruitment forms online, fill them out, and present themselves at designated centres for consideration.

Please follow and like us:

ACTIVIST SEEKS RECUSAL OF JUDGES IN GACHAGUA IMPEACHMENT CASE.

By Sam Alfan.

A human rights activist wants the recusal of a bench of three judges handling the cases on the impeachment of former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua.

In a new application, activist Joseph Aura wants Justices Eric Ogola, Anthony Mrima, and Fridah Mugambi to quit handling the cases over alleged bias.

Aura claims the bench unfairly failed to consolidate his petition—challenging both Gachagua’s impeachment and Prof Kithure Kindiki’s appointment in his place.

Aura argues that his case has been improperly isolated, prompting the application for the judges’ recusal.

Through his lawyer Harrison Kinyanjui, Aura told the court that he felt discriminated against, in violation of Article 27(4) of the Constitution of Kenya.

He emphasized that his petition raises issues substantially similar to those in the consolidated cases but has been excluded without justification.

“The petitioner stands to suffer prejudice, as the consolidated petitions—raising similar issues—are proceeding while his is sidelined. This exclusion undermines fairness and justice,” lawyer Kinyanjui submitted.

Kinyanjui argued that the court’s approach could lead to Aura’s case being dismissed on technical grounds, once the same issues are addressed in the consolidated petitions.

“This creates the impression that the court intends to sideline the petitioner and subject him to a technical knockout,” he added.

According to Aura, his request for recusal was not made in bad faith but is intended to preserve the integrity of the judicial process, particularly given the directions previously issued by the Chief Justice calling for an expanded bench.

Aura said he was invoking Articles 25(c), 48, and 50(1) of the Constitution, which guarantee the right to a fair trial, access to justice, and a hearing before an impartial tribunal.

He maintains that proceeding with his petition separately undermines these protections and creates a perception of bias.

The court heard that allowing two parallel proceedings—one involving Aura and another comprising the consolidated petitions—risks inconsistent rulings on the same constitutional issues, including the legality of Gachagua’s impeachment and Kindiki’s appointment during a period when there was no functional electoral body.

“It will be wholly inconvenient and may result in conflicting decisions,” Aura argued.

The activist further contends that Section 24 of the Leadership and Integrity Act prohibits the discriminatory treatment he has experienced. He insists that the recusal of the current bench is necessary to uphold transparency, fairness, and good governance.

“Ignoring binding precedent and isolating my petition is an act of bias that entitles me to seek the court’s recusal,” he stated.

Aura concluded that his petition cannot be fairly heard by the current bench, which he believes falls short of the constitutional threshold of impartiality.

He reiterated that the Chief Justice had directed the formation of a five-judge bench to handle petitions raising similar issues—an instruction the current bench failed to follow.

Please follow and like us:

CITY LAWYER SUES FORMER LSK PRESIDENT NELSON HAVI FOR DEFAMATION.

By Sam Alfan.

City lawyer Philip Nyachoti has filed a defamation lawsuit against former Law Society of Kenya (LSK) President Nelson Havi over statements published on social media.

In the suit, Nyachoti accuses Havi of making malicious and false claims about him through posts on X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook.

He is seeking a permanent injunction restraining Havi from publishing, posting, disseminating, broadcasting, or in any way making or causing to be made any statements concerning him on X, Facebook, or any other social media platform.

Nyachoti is also seeking general, exemplary, punitive, and aggravated damages for the alleged harm to his personal and professional reputation.
According to court documents, the alleged defamatory statements were posted by Havi on December 22, 2024.

Nyachoti claims that in two posts made on X and Facebook, Havi published false and disparaging remarks about him, knowing the statements to be untrue and intended to harm his reputation.

In one of the posts, Havi reportedly referenced an unnamed Kisii judge and two advocates, one of whom Nyachoti believes was himself. The tweet garnered more than 139,500 views by 11:07 pm on the same day.
Nyachoti alleges that the statements were made with ill intent and malice and were aimed at tarnishing his personal and professional image.

He claims that the posts directly or indirectly questioned his conduct and integrity, thereby lowering his standing in the eyes of right-thinking members of society—especially within the legal fraternity, the judiciary, and among current and prospective clients.
Nyachoti says he had built a solid reputation as an advocate of the High Court of Kenya and widely respected both locally and internationally.

He states that the defamatory remarks were “tailor-made” to incite doubt among his clients and potentially lead to the termination of their professional engagements with him.

He further contends that the motive behind Havi’s statements was to damage his reputation and erode his clientele, which includes top-tier banks and financial institutions, commercial investment and trading companies, manufacturing and construction firms, county governments, and parastatals.

“As a result of the said statements, the Plaintiff has suffered and continues to suffer loss and damage to both his personal and professional reputation, as well as his standing in society,” Nyachoti states in his claim.

He argues that Havi either knew or ought to have known that the statements would portray him as guilty in the eyes of the public and influence negative perception against him.

Nevertheless, he alleges, Havi published the statements with impunity, intending to damage his career, reputation, and social standing.

Please follow and like us:

OKI GENERAL TRADING APPEALS KRA’S SH810 MILLION TAX DEMAND.

By Sam Alfan.

Oki General Trading Limited has moved to the Tax Appeals Tribunal, challenging the Kenya Revenue Authority’s (KRA) decision to disallow imports worth Sh349,287,179, claiming customs duty was not paid.

The procurement and logistics solutions company is also contesting KRA’s move to subject director and staff withdrawals amounting to Sh604,653,420 to Pay As You Earn (PAYE) taxation.

The Ruaraka-based firm wants the Tribunal to overturn the decision by the Commissioner of Domestic Taxes, which it claims erroneously categorized these withdrawals as income subject to PAYE.

According to Oki General Trading, KRA misapplied both fact and law in assessing Corporate Income Tax (CIT) amounting to Sh162,912,591 on alleged stock reconciliation variances—despite the company asserting that no such variances existed.

Additionally, the company has faulted the Commissioner for disallowing import-related costs and VAT-exempt purchases, leading to a further CIT assessment of Sh53,446,914.

“The Commissioner of Domestic Taxes erred in law and fact by assessing PAYE amounting to Sh5,726,184 on staff salaries for the period October 2020 to September 2025,” the company states in documents filed with the Tribunal.

Oki General Trading further claims that KRA wrongly assessed PAYE of Sh11,249,158 on staff reimbursements, treating them as taxable benefits. It also disputes the classification of certain payments as commissions subject to PAYE of Sh972,360, arguing they were for goods and services—not employment-related commissions.

The company strongly objects to KRA’s move to subject payments made to Satnam Limited to PAYE, insisting the funds were unauthorized and had been misappropriated by a former director, Honey Katwani, who is currently facing criminal charges for allegedly stealing Sh356 million.

The High Court has already ruled on the matter, ordering Katwani, his wife, Jayesh Soni, and Poonam Mangtani to repay the misappropriated funds.

The judgment entered by the court amounts to USD 2,786,806.05 (approximately Sh362,284,786.50) against Galaxy Middle East & Africa T/A Smart Pro, Honey Katwani, Jayesh Soni, and Poonam Mangtani, jointly and severally.

Following this, Oki General Trading filed an application before the High Court’s Commercial Division, seeking a judgment against the company and directors for the same amount. The company also requested a permanent closure of warehouses in Nairobi and Mombasa operated by Galaxy Middle East & Asia Limited and a return of the goods stored therein.

Before the Tribunal, Oki General Trading is also challenging CIT amounting to Sh10,859,159 assessed on alleged undeclared sales linked to Satnam Limited.

The company claims that KRA wrongly disallowed capital allowances due to the absence of an asset register and proof of ownership, resulting in a further CIT assessment of Sh2,171,491.

“The Commissioner of Domestic Taxes erred in law and fact by assessing VAT amounting to Sh5,791,551 on alleged understated sales linked to Satnam Limited, despite Oki’s denial of any affiliation,” the company states.

Furthermore, the firm is contesting VAT amounting to Sh86,886,715 assessed on stock reconciliation variances, maintaining that the figures align with audited financial statements in accordance with Section 13(2) of the Tax Appeals Tribunal Act.

The firm explained that KRA conducted an audit of its operations for the period 1st October 2020 to 31st December 2024, and subsequently issued an assessment letter dated 10th April 2025.

In the letter, KRA demanded additional taxes, including Corporate Income Tax (CIT), Value Added Tax (VAT), Withholding Tax (WHT), and PAYE, totaling Sh810,924,663, inclusive of penalties and interest.

“Being dissatisfied with KRA’s demand and keen to safeguard its legal rights, the company lodged a Notice of Objection on 10th May 2025, pursuant to Section 51 of the Tax Procedures Act (TPA),” Oki states.

However, KRA went ahead and issued its Objection Decision on 17th July 2025, confirming the assessment, now revised to Sh827 million.

KRA reviewed the Ecobank and Absa Bank statements for the referenced
periods and asserted that total withdrawals amounting to Sh.604,653,420 made by charged Khatwani,Anil Kumar Ramchandani, Jatin Aswani and Jayesh Soni ought to be subjected to Pay As You Earn (PAYE) tax.

The company claims that Taxman’s position is premised on the
assumption that these withdrawals constituted emoluments paid in the course of employment.

But the company asserts that the amounts withdrawn by the aforementioned individuals do not constitute salaries, wages, bonuses, or any form of remuneration for services rendered.

Rather, the withdrawals were petty cash disbursements used exclusively for
business-related expenses, including procurement of office supplies, payment for
catered meals for employees, and reimbursements for operational costs incurred on behalf of the company.

The company claims these transactions were not made in furtherance of an employer-employee
relationship, but in the ordinary course of business administration.

According to the company Section 3(2)(a)(ii) of the Income Tax Act (Cap 470) provides that income tax shall be charged on income in respect of gains or profits from employment or services rendered.

The company claim that KRA has not adduced any evidence to demonstrate that the withdrawals constituted remuneration for services rendered under a contract of employment.

” The individuals in question are directors and non-salary employees. The funds withdrawn were utilised for business operations and not for personal gain,” claim the company.

Oki General Trading ltd therefore submits that the PAYE assessment of Sh 216,385,508 issued
by KRA is without merit and should be set aside in its entirety.

“The withdrawals in question do not fall within the scope of taxable emoluments under the Income Tax Act and PAYE Rules, and no employer-employee relationship has been
established to warrant such an assessment,” says the company.

Please follow and like us:

COURT ORDERS CBK TO RELEASE REDACTED INTERNAL AUDIT STAFF PROFILE.

By Sam Alfan .

The Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) has been directed to supply a redacted version of the Internal Audit Staff Profiles that were in place during its staff translation or migration exercises—Phase One dated 24th August 2016, and the second dated 13th December 2021.

In a ruling, the Employment and Labour Relations Court ordered that the redacted profiles be provided to Bramwel Kibet Sigowo within 21 days, in compliance with the Data Protection Act, 2019.

While issuing the directive, the court acknowledged the delicate balance between CBK’s and its employees’ right to privacy, and Kibet’s right to access information necessary to advance his case.

The court observed that there was no doubt the documents sought by Kibet contain personal and potentially confidential information.

Kibet sought to compel CBK to release or disclose the Internal Audit Staff Profiles from the two specified phases.

The documents, which he said are in CBK’s custody, detail for each employee their qualifications, current position held, years served in the position, and the translated designation.

Kibet argued the documents were necessary for him to comply with his obligations under Order 11 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010, regarding the exchange of documents.

In addition to disclosure, Kibet also requested the court to direct CBK to release the profiles to him immediately.

He told the court that CBK is both the originator and custodian of the profiles, which were created during his tenure as an employee and are relevant for inclusion in his list of documents for the case.

He argued that he cannot lawfully include documents he did not author in his list without disclosure or permission from CBK.

And despite making reasonable and repeated requests, he claimed CBK had failed or refused to release the documents voluntarily.

He maintained that it was in the interest of justice, fairness, and procedural propriety that CBK be compelled to provide the requested information.

In response, CBK opposed the application, arguing that Kibet’s attempt to compel production under Order 11 was procedurally improper.

The bank contended that such a request should have been made via summons to produce under Order 16 of the Civil Procedure Rules.

CBK further argued that the application sought the blanket production of all Internal Audit Staff Profiles from the two periods, without a clearly defined scope or specific list.

The bank’s regulator maintained that request amounted to an undue burden and risk of overproduction, and contravened the duty of specificity required under both Order 11 and Order 16.

Please follow and like us:

WHY PROSECUTION IS SEEKING TO RECOVER MONEY FROM TEACHER IMPERSONATOR.

By Reporter.

A woman has been charged with impersonating a trained teacher and securing a job with Teachers Service Commission (TSC).

Caroline Makena Kinyua alias Kairuthi Caroline Kubai appeared before Milimani Senior Principal Magistrate Benmark Ekhubi, where she was charged with acquiring over Sh294,000 from the teachers employer..

The charge sheet stated that Makena acquired the money fraudulently by presenting herself as a public officer employed as a teacher.

It is alleged that she committed the offence between 15 May 2023 and 1 February 2024 at Doldol Primary School, in Laikipia County in Laikipia North Sub-County.

The court further heard that on 8 of May, 2023 at Laikipia North Sub-county within Laikipia County, Makena falsely represented herself to be Kairuthi Caroline Kubai of TSC No. 849*** to Mellen Gesemba, the TSC Sub-County Director Laikipia North.

The charges stated that she impersonated Kairuthi, with intend to defraud and seeking for deployment as a teacher.

Makena is also charged with uttering a false Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education Certificate No. 1107*** issued to Kairuthi Caroline Kubai by the Kenya National Examination Council.

It is alleged that she deceived the employer that the certificate belonged to her, while seeking deployment as a teacher on the 8 day of May, 2023 at Laikipia County at TSC Office, in Laikipia County.

The court directed Makena to deposit in court, cash bail of Sh150,000, to secure her release.

Kairuthi who was ready to testify, told the court that she cannot get employment since her current status indicates that she is an employee of TSC.

Please follow and like us:

FINANCIAL CONTROLLER CHARGED WITH STEALING MILLIONS FROM HER EMPLOYER.

By NT Correspondent.

A financial controller with Sheffield Steels Systems Limited has been charged with stealing Sh146 million from the company.

Jane Achieng Eshiwani Okumu appeared before Milimani Chief Magistrate Lucas Onyina and denied the theft and money laundering charges.

It is alleged that she stole the money, which came into her possession by virtue of her employment.

The charge sheet stated that she committed the offence between May 15, 2018 and August 25, 2021, at the company’s offices Off Mombasa Road in Nairobi City.

The court heard that on the 5 day of March 2021, Achieng made a letter referenced SS/FD/FC/20210105/41, dated 5 March 2021, in the name of Dr. Suresh Kanotra, the Managing Director of Sheffield Steel Systems, with intent to deceive.

She is also accused of performed acts, whose effect is to conceal the source of the Sh146,519,431.75, which money she knew or ought to have reasonably known that it was or forms part of proceeds of crime.

She is alleged to have committed the offence on diverse dates between the month of October 2018 and March 2021, at unknown place.

The finance officer was also accused of using the stolen funds to purchase motor vehicles, with plans to conceal the source of the money.

She allegedly committed the offence on diverse dates between the month of October 2018 and March 2021, when she purchased a Honda CRV, KCU 870E.

The prosecution further said that while knowing that the money formed part of proceeds of crime, she entered into transactions for the purchase a Toyota Fortuner, registration number KCV 485W, for Sh2.7 million.

Achieng will remain in custody until next week.

Please follow and like us:

TRADER CHARGED WITH DEFRAUDING WOMAN OF SH2.3 MILLION.

By NT Correspondent.

A Nairobi businessman has been charged with Sh2.3 million fraud.

Yasser Abdelwahab Mohammed appeared before Milimani Chief Magistrate Lucas Onyina where he denied the charge.

The prosecution alleged that he obtained the money from Nasra Ibrahim by pretended to be in a position to import and install a water filtration machine at her farm.

The charge sheet alleged that he committed the offence on diverse dates between 1 March and 30 November 2024, in Nairobi County, by means of fraudulent tricks and induced Nasra into parting with her money.

He was released on a cash bail of Sh.200,000.

Please follow and like us:

FORMER NCPB BOSS FREED IN FAKE FERTILIZER SCAM CHARGES.

By Sam Alfan.

Former National Cereal Produce Board (NCPB) Managing Director Joseph Muna Kimote is a free man.

The former MD can now breathe easy after an anti-corruption court acquitted him of charges conspiracy to defraud farmers over Sh209 million, by supplying fake fertilizer.

Milimani Anti-Corruption Magistrate Celesa Asis Okore acquitted Kimote of charges of conspiracy to defraud farmers and abuse office charges.

Kimote had been charged alongside John Kiplangat Ngetich, John Mbaya Matiri ,SBL Innovative Manufacturers Limited and Fifty-One (K) Ltd and its director, Josiah Kariuki Kimani.

They were alleged to have conspired to defraud Kenyan farmers by selling them 139,688 bags of 25 Kgs each of soil amendment and Conditioner valued at Sh 209,532,000, disguised as fertilizer. They are alleged to have committed the offence between 17th March, 2022 and 8 March, 2024.

Kimote was also accused of using his office to improperly confer a benefit to Kariuki, an offence he allegedly committed on 31st March 2022 as NCPB MD.

The trial magistrate, however, ruled that the prosecution had not established a case against Kimote.

His lawyer Kimani Wachira said he was happy that his client had been vindicated.

Kimote had also been accused of executing an agency contract between the NCPA and 51 Capital, African Diatomite Industries Ltd to supply 139,688 Bags of 25 Kgs each of soil amendment and conditioner branded as fertilizer to the state agency.

Other accused persons will be placed on their defence.

Please follow and like us: