Justice G.B. Kariuki (centre), Festus Azangalala (left) and Fatuma Sichale delivering the judgement on alcohol blow on Friday March 7 ,2017.


The Court of Appeal has outlawed traffic regulations that criminalize drunk driving.

“We find no merit in the appeal. The high court (Majanja J) did not error in denying the appellants the reliefs they sought in their petition dated 28 February 2014” said the bench.

The Breathaliser Rules do not create an offence independent of Sections 44 and 45 of the Traffic Act, the court ruled.

“No one can be charged under Rule 3(1) of the Breathaliser Rules. To that extent, it does not reinforce the provisions of Section 44 (1) of the Trafic Act as was intended,” Justices G.B. Kariuki, Festus Azangalala and Fatuma Sichale said.

“As the need to prohibit drunk-driving is still dire, and this matter being of great public interest, no doubt the authorities will move with quick dispatch to remedy the position,” they said.

“Although the enforcement of the traffic Breathlyser rules 2010 is part of the lawful duty of police to detect crime, they were badly drafted and must give way to the Traffic Act,” the Judges pointed out.

In the case Reminisce Sports Bar Limited moved to court against the Cabinet Secretary Ministry of Roads, NTSA and others saying that the alcoblow rules have adversely affected the business due to dwindling members of customers on account of fear of being nabbed by police for drunk driving.

The Night Club and entertainment facility located at Langata Road in Nairobi County claimed that the alcloblow rules were void and inconsistent with article 94(5) of the constitution of Kenya 2010.

The owner of the said facility in his affidavit argued that the minister has no powers to prescribe the use of the breathalyzer and limits of alcohol consumption.

The owner of the bar Kariuki Ruitha faulted the police saying that the requirement to supply specimens of breath before arrest on reasonable suspicion of having committed a traffic offence is illegal.

He further submitted that the use of road blocks by the police to subject motorists to breath tests is unreasonable violates the rights and freedoms of the motorists.

The respondents in their submission said that driving under the influence of alcohol is an offence under the Traffic Act adding that the breathalyzer is intended to assess the level of intoxication to determine the motorist’s capacity to control driving.