WHY LOBBY GROUP SEEKS TO QUASH INCREASE OF MOTOR-VEHICLE INSURANCE PREMIUMS.

BY SAM ALFAN.

Kenya Human Rights Commission (KHRC) has moved to court to suspend a decision by insurance companies to exclude motor-vehicles which are more than 12 years old or with a value below Kshs 600,000 from providing a comprehensive cover.

“Unless the court intervenes and halts the changes, consumers will continue to greatly suffer as their safety and economic interests are compromised,” says the commission in court documents.  

In the petition, the commission further wants the court to issue a conservatory order suspending the decision by insurance companies to unjustifiably increase premiums for both the motor vehicle third party cover and comprehensive cover beginning this year 2022.

“A conservatory order suspending the decision by insurance companies to exclude motor-vehicles which are more than 12 years old or with a value of Kshs 600,000 and below from their Comprehensive Cover pending the hearing and determination of this Petition”, the commission urges.

KHRC argues that the Motor-vehicle insurance is mandatory in Kenya and it serves to ensure the safety of motor-vehicle owners, third parties and the public in general and motor-vehicle owners are therefore required to take out motor-vehicle insurance which can either be a comprehensive cover or third party cover.  

It argues that Insurance Regulatory Authority and Association of Kenya Insurers are mandated to among others regulate, supervise and develop the insurance industry. By virtue of these roles the Respondent controls insurance players and business in Kenya;  

“Policy holders are therefore consumers of insurance services and are entitled to the protection of their health, safety and economic interests and vide various mass media and communique sent to their customers, a number of insurance companies have publicly announced an increase of up-to 50% of premiums starting the year 2022 for Motor-Vehicle Comprehensive cover and the third party over,” says the commission.  

The court heard that ordinarily, premiums for the comprehensive cover are tabulated using a definite formula which was 4% of the value of the motor-vehicle. Any amount above this has to be justified and has to involve consumers/public, the commission stated.

The underwriters allegedly attributed the increase in premiums to a surge of claims, some of which are fraudulent.

But KHRC says this is not a reason to increase the premiums considering that the law provides safeguards which allows insurance companies to repudiate claims that are not genuine.

“Considering the mandatory nature of motor-vehicle insurance the said actions of insurance companies are discriminatory, unjustified and illegal. The said actions also amount to a violation of consumer rights and are punitive, insensitive and oppressive,” KHRC says in court documents.

Please follow and like us:

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here