Blog Page 244

REVIEW MY 100 MILLION BAIL,LENOLKULAL URGES HIGH COURT.

0
Samburu Governor Moses Kasaine Lenolkulal being removed handcuffs by a police before Milimani Anti-Corruption Court where he pleaded not guilty to corruption charges./PHOTO BY S.A.N.

BY SAM ALFAN.

Samburu Governor Moses Kasaine Lenolkulal has filed an application at the High Court seeking to review hefty bond terms granted by the a lower court.

In his certificate of urgency filed yesterday evening before High Court Anti-Corruption court, he urged the court to review a bond of Sh 150 million or cash of Sh 100 million saying the same are unreasonable bond terms imposed to him by the chief magistrate Douglas Ogoti.

The governor who spent the night in prison after failing to raise the bond terms through lawyer Paul Nyamondi says that he is aggrieved by the said bond terms which are completely outrageous and unprecedented.

“It goes against the bail and bond policy , especially that bond amount not to be excessive and should not be greater than necessary to guarantee that the accused persons will appear in court,” said the Governor.

The Governor was released on a cash bail of 100 million and option of 150 million bond after he denied several charges of corruption of loss of millions of shillings at his county government.

The magistrate impose the stiff bond terms on the governor after concurreed with the prosecution that the charges he faces are very serious.

He was also barred from accessing the office during the pendency of the trial notwithstanding the provisions of section 62(6) of ACECA.

The court further directed the director of IFMIS to suspend access rights to the 13 accused persons onto the IFMIS platform.

The governor faces charges of conspiracy to commit economic crimes and conflict of interest. However his 13 co-accused persons has since not pleaded to the charges as they are yet to be apprehended.

In the case Lenolkulal is charged alongside his Deputy governor Julius Lawrence Leseeto, county secretary Stephen Siringa Letinina, Chief County Secretary Danuel Nakuo Lenolkirina, Josephine Naamo Lenasalia, Reuben Marumben Lemunyete. Linus Milton Lenolngenje, Paul Lolmingani, Benard Ltarasi Lesurmat, Lililian Balanga , Andrew Ropilo Lanyasunya, David England Loosenge and Geofrey Barun Kitewan.

The charges against them states that between March 27 ,2013 and March 25,2019 at Maralal town within Samburu County being Governor of Samburu county conspired to commit an offence of corruption namely abuse of office leading to unlawful payment of Kshs. 84,695,996,55 to Moses Kasaine Lenolkulal oryx service station.

The Governor who was arrested on Tuesday Morning is alone accused that between March 27,2013 and March 25,2019 at Samburu County being the government County being an agent at the samburu county government as the Governor and being the sole proprietor of ORYX Service Station , he knowingly acquired a direct private interest in contracts between Oryx Service Station and Samburu County Government for supply of fuel.

Lenolkulal and Hesbon Jack Wachira Ndathi are accused that between March 27,2013 and March 25,2019 within Samburu county being the Governor od Samburu County and Private person , they unlawfully acquired public property worth Kshs. 84, 695,996.55 for the supply of fuel to Samburu County Government through Oryx Service Station.

His arrest and arraignment in court on Tuesday followed after the DPP recommended his prosecution together with his 13 co-accused persons after being satisfied that there is enough evidence to prove the charges against them.

RELIEF FOR NAIROBI COUNTY AS COUNTY SUSPENDS OF OVER SH 800 MILLION TO LAW FIRM.

0
The Office of Nairobi County Government Governor Mike Sonko./PHOTO BY S.A.N.
BY SAM ALFAN.

The High Court has suspended the order compelling Nairobi County government to pay a law firm Sh847 million.

Justice Pauline Nyamweya suspended the payment of Kshs 847,887,435.97 to Samson Masaba Munikah T/A Munikah & Advocates. Another judge had directed the County Secretary and Chief Finance Officer or the county Treasury to pay the city law firm the amount after winning a case recently.

“There be stay of the execution of orders issued on February, 2019 for 10 days pending hearing of the said notice of motion inter-partes on April 9, 2019,” ordered Judge Nyamweya.

The court also suspended payments of 9,756,512.96 million arising from interests of the amount, which had accrued since July 29, 2016.

Justice John Mativo had on February 25, issued an order directing the county government to pay the law firm after he moved to court saying he had been duly instructed by defunct city council of Nairobi to act for them in a case before a magistrate in 2003.

And after conclusion of the matter, (Nairobi (city council vs The Attorney General (for the commissioner of lands), the Advocate filed a bill of costs and the parties came to an agreement.

The Nairobi County Government aggrieved by the court decision filed an application under certificate of urgency seeking to suspend the said decision.

Through Lawyer Thomas Letangule, the county argued the firm is in the process of executing the orders and recover the colossal amount.

He said the County government later discovered that there was fraud and collusion to inflate legal fee through double taxation of costs. He further said that the law firm did not disclose to the court that another taxation had been done earlier over the same matter and were paid Kshs. 60,712,373.

“A perusal of the records now reveals that the respondent (Samson Masaba Munikah T/A Munikah & Advocates) has been paid in excess of the taxed amount, having received Kshs. 65,000,000 from the applicant (Nairobi County),” says the application.

He said despite the payment, the respondent has obtained orders from court based on a second certificate of taxation that was wrongly issued out of fraud and collusion in the same matter.

“The Nairobi City County  has now moved to court for orders to set aside the subject certificate of taxation dated August 7,2012 for Kshs. 498,757,315.28 which was obtained by application of wrong principles and manifest fraud hence the urgency of this application to avert a loss of huge amounts of public money,” says the county.

The county said while granting the orders, the court observed that the subject certificate of taxation was never set aside or varied.

The county said legal fees were awarded wrongly and that the deputy registrar erred in law and principle by granting two certificates of taxation in respect of the same matter resulting in an oppressive amount that has now threatened the financial stability and functioning of the County Government in its provision of public services.

The county government said deputy registrar erred in principal by awarding a manifestly excessive amount that has now accumulated interest to the tune of Kshs. 846,887,435.97.

“The fraud was not discovered until lately when new administration had managed to get a firm grip of things that have always been done in secret by the perpetrators of the said acts of criminality,” added the county government.

The lawyer said the county government has unearthed a scheme that was used to loot public resources through fraud and collusion to inflate legal fees in an unprecedented theft of public funds and has therefore instituted a reference to set aside manifestly excessive amount that was awarded as legal fee owing to application of wrong principles by the taxing officer and fraud on the part of parties involved.

“It has taken a long time to get to the root of a well-calculated and choreographed fraudulent scheme owing to the fact that the perpetrators were in control of the county directly and through proxies and therefore the reference was not filed on time to revise or set aside the impugned certificate of tax”, added the county government.

The county government added that the first certificate of taxation dated January 16,2007 was awarded in favour of the respondent for the amount of Kshs. 60,712,373 after representing the the county council in RMCC No. 2 of 2003.

“Under unclear circumstances, the respondent moved back to court again in RMCC No. 2 of 2003 after about four years as in an afterthought and filed a second bill of costs dated May 25 ,2011 in respect of the same matter, erroneously basing the second bill of costs on the amount in the counterclaim yet the instructions the firm was given initially covered the entire suit and in any case instruction fees are always awarded for entire suit regardless of the stage and documents filed in the suit,” stated in the court documents.

The documents state that the respondent has initiated a process of execution for a colossal amount of Kshs. 847,887,435.97 despite having been paid legal fees per the certificate of taxation initially issued in the matter and the matter giving rise to the legal fees pending in court since 2003.

 
“Under unclear circumstances, the respondent moved back to court again in RMCC No. 2 of 2003 after about four years as in an afterthought and filed a second bill of costs dated May 25 ,2011 in respect of the same matter, erroneously basing the second bill of costs on the amount in the counterclaim yet the instructions the firm was given initially covered the entire suit and in any case instruction fees are always awarded for entire suit regardless of the stage and documents filed in the suit,” stated in the court documents.
 
The documents state that the respondent has initiated a process of execution for a colossal amount of Kshs. 847,887,435.97 despite having been paid legal fees per the certificate of taxation initially issued in the matter and the matter giving rise to the legal fees pending in court since 2003.

SAMBURU GOVERNOR FACING GRAFT TRIAL RELEASED ON SH 100 MILLION CASH BAIL.

0
Samburu Governor Moses Kasaine Lenolkulal being removed handcuffs by a police before Milimani Anti-Corruption Court where he pleaded not guilty to corruption charges./PHOTO BY S.A.N.

BY NT CORRESPONDENT.

Samburu Governor Moses Kasaine Lenolkulal who has been charged with the the loss of funds of over Sh 87 has suffered a major blow after the court slapped him with a hefty cash bail of Sh 100 million.

In his ruling Milimani Chief magistrate dougly Ogoti concurred with the prosecution that the county boss to be grantee stiff bail terms saying that the charges he faces are very serious.

“I hereby order the accused person to be released on a Sh 150million bond or a cash bail of Sh 100 million,” ruled the magistrate.

The learned magistrate Ogoti barred the Governor from access the Samburu County government offices in Maralal town.

The governor denied several charges of conspiracy to commit economic crimes and conflict of interest. However his 13 co-accused persons did not plead to the charges as they are yet to be apprehended.

In the case Lenolkulal is charged alongside his Deputy governor Julius Lawrence Leseeto, county secretary Stephen Siringa Letinina, Chief County Secretary Danuel Nakuo Lenolkirina, Josephine Naamo Lenasalia, Reuben Marumben Lemunyete. Linus Milton Lenolngenje, Paul Lolmingani, Benard Ltarasi Lesurmat, Lililian Balanga , Andrew Ropilo Lanyasunya, David England Loosenge and Geofrey Barun Kitewan.

The charges against them states that between March 27 ,2013 and March 25,2019 at Maralal town within Samburu County being Governor of Samburu county conspired to commit an offence of corruption namely abuse of office leading to unlawful payment of Kshs. 84,695,996,55 to Moses Kasaine Lenolkulal oryx service station.

The Director of Public Prosecution through his assistant Alexander Muteti urged the court to order Samburu Governor Kasaine to stay away from office for 24 months.

He said the Governor is facing serious charges and prosecution will call witnesses who work at his office.

Muteti, he applied the court to order director of treasury IFMIS to block all the accused persons in the case from accessing it.

However the court has directed the DPP to file a formal application on the issues.

The Governor who was arrested on Tuesday Morning is alone accused that between March 27,2013 and March 25,2019 at Samburu County being the government County being an agent at the samburu county government as the Governor and being the sole proprietor of ORYX Service Station , he knowingly acquired a direct private interest in contracts between Oryx Service Station and Samburu County Government for supply of fuel.

Lenolkulal and Hesbon Jack Wachira Ndathi are accused that between March 27,2013 and March 25,2019 within Samburu county being the Governor od Samburu County and Private person , they unlawfully acquired public property worth Kshs. 84, 695,996.55 for the supply of fuel to Samburu County Government through Oryx Service Station.

His arrest and arraignment in court followed after the DPP recommended his prosecution together with his 13 co-accused persons after satisfied he has enough evidence to prove the charges against him.

COURT FREEZE’S ACCOUNTS OVER 106 MILLION COMPENSATION PAYMENT BY NLC FOR SOUTHERN BYPASS EXPANSION.

0
Ardhi House home of National Land Commission and Ministry of Lands.
BY SAM ALFAN.

High court has issued orders freezing bank accounts belonging two people and a company for a period of six months pending investigations into allegations over alleged illicit payment of over 106 million made by National Land Commission for compensation for acquisitions of land for expansion of Mombasa southern bypass Kipevu road.

Justice Mumbi Ngugi of High Court Anti-Corruption Division issued orders after Ethics and Anti-corruption Commission filed application under certificate of urgency seeking to prohibit the three namely Asia Akhtar Nazir Ahmed, Tarah Begum Khan and Tornado Carriers Limited, from withdrawing or dealing with said money held At NIC Bank.

“A preservation order is hereby issued prohibiting the respondents (Tornado Carriers Limited, Asia Akhtar Nazir Ahmed and Tarah Begum Khan) jointly and severally, their agents, servants or any other persons from withdrawing , transferring, disposing or in any other way dealing with the funds held in the bank accounts at NIC Bank in the name of Asia Akhtar Nazir Ahmed and in the name of Tarah Begun Khan “, ordered Justice Ngugi.

The learned judge further directed that the said orders shall subsist for a period of six months. She also n certified urgent the application and the commission was ordered to serve the parties.

The orders were issued after the commission filed an application seeking to prohibit the three from withdrawing or dealing with said money pending investigations into allegations of corruption and economic crimes over alleged illicit payment made by National Land Commission in return to facilitate irregular compensation for acquisitions of land for expansion of roads and construction of by- pass on behalf of the Kenya National Highways Authority (KENHA).

According to documents filed in court, preliminary investigations have established that the National Land Commission compulsorily acquired LR. NO MN/VI/3801 and made an award for Sh 109, 769, 363 in favour of the registered owner, M/s Tornado Carriers Limited.

The said award of Sh 109,769,363 was paid in two bank accounts. Tornado Carriers Limited received Sh 55,269,363 in its SBM Bank account while the reminder Sh 54,500,000 was paid to C.W. Chege Advocates and subsequently , the amount deposited in Tornado Carriers Limited account which was later moved to two accounts at NIC Bank in the name of Asia Akhtar Nazir Ahmed at NIC Bank in the name of Tarah Begum Khan.

EACC claims that the amount deposited in C.W Chege Advocates account was distributed or disbursed to officials of the National Land Commission.

The commission has established that the officials of the NLC that are in receipt of the funds disbursed from C.W. Chege Advocates account are, Sh 900,000 to Director valuation and Taxation NLC Salome Ludenyi Munubi, Sh 7 million to Deputy Director, valuation and Taxation NLC , another Sh 7 million to Ag. Director Finance Bernard Cherutich and Sh 3,020,000 to Secretary valuation and Taxation directorate Lilian Keverenge.

“There is reasonable suspicion , in view of the kickbacks to the officials of NLC that the award of 109,769,363 million was vastly inflated and the commission is in pursuit to unearth the circumstances surrounding the award.

The commission said that the preliminary investigations have established that the LR. No. MN/VI/3801, subject matter of the acquisition was vide a charge dated June 30,2005 to Imperial Bank Limited for Sh 9,500,000 and therefore the bank by virtue of section 107(7) of the Land Axt ,2012 has an interest over the parcel of land.

It was further established that the said land has been consolidated with another parcels LR.No. MN/VI+/2364 all belonging to Tornado Carriers Limited and used as security for several financing facilities from Imperial Bank.

” It is established that as at December 31,2018, Tornado Carriers Limited is indebted to the bank to the tune of 137,271828.71,” reads the court documents.

“Preliminary investigations have established that NLC abdicated its duty under section 112 of the Land Act ,2012 to serve a copy of notice of enquiry upon Imperial Bank inviting to present its claim over the subject parcel of land,” said EACC.

The commission on behalf of KENHA acquired the parcel of land that is encumbered thereby exposing the Government to grave risk of loss of public funds and in the likely event there is default, the government will be forced to offset the loab facilities or incur costs as a result of litigation in securing an unencumbered title.

Investigations by the commission has established that the Sh 109,769,363 was paid out by the NLC without securing an unencumbered title thereby putting the government at risk of substantial loss.

It has been established that half of the amount was paid back as kickbacks to the NLC officials thereby occasioning loss of public funds.

EACC says that it is apprehensive that respondents in the light of ongoing investigations may in the interfere, withdraw, transfer, dispose or any other deal with the funds in the aforesaid accounts to defeat the course of justice before the commission has complete its investigations and commence recovery proceedings.

In supporting affidavit by the agency investigating officer Catherine Ngari said NLC failed to carry out an official search at the land’s registry to ascertain the current status of the LR.No. MN/VI/3801 and if it carried the search, it blatantly neglected to safeguard the public interest by ensuring that there is discharge of the encumbrance on the subject parcel to secure a good title for KENHA.

COURT SUSPENDS LAW CRIMINALISING FAILURE TO DISCLOSE DUAL CITIZENSHIP.

0
Embattled billionaire Humphrey Kariuki before a Nairobi Court./PHOTO BY S.A.N.

BY SAM ALFAN.

High court has temporary suspended a section 8(4) of the Immigration Act that punishes citizens for failing to disclose their dual citizenship.

Justice James Makau suspended Section which prescribes a fine of 5 million, three years’ imprisonment, or both, if one fails to disclose this status within three months of acquiring it.

Makau issued the orders after billionaire Humphrey Kariuki Ndegwa the owner of Africa Spirits Limited who is under probe of evasion of taxes amounting to Sh3 billion petitioned the court seeking to declare section 8 (4) of Kenya citizenship and immigration act unconstitutional on grounds that it is oppressive, unjust and unreasonable.

“I have considered the application by the petitioner(Kariuki) and the injury he is going to suffer l hereby temporary suspend and stay the continued implementation of section 8(4) of Kenya citizenship and immigration act against the him or any other Kenyan citizen in Kenya or in diaspora who has acquired dual citizenship pending inter parties of the case,” ordered Justice Makau.

The orders means that Kariuki will not be arrested or charged in court fro failure to disclose he has dual citizenship pending the conclusion of the case he has filed in court challenging the law on dual citizenship.

Kariuki who also holds a Cypriot passport since May 2016, in his court documents claims that Section limits freedom of movement as provided by the Constitution.

He further alleges that the law provides no defence or an exception if the stipulated time frame of three months upon getting the second citizenship elapses.

Kariuki says he was not aware that as a Kenyan citizen he was supposed to disclose his dual citizenship within three months of acquiring the same a condition not subjected to foreign nationals.

The businessman says also the penalty under the section as stiff, arbitrary, oppressive and unjustifiable since it involves an administrative issue of disclosure that can be solved through less restrictive means.

Documents filed in court, Kariuki says he was not aware that as a Kenyan citizen he was supposed to disclose his dual citizenship within three months of acquiring the same a condition not subjected to foreign nationals.

He adds that when he became aware, he immediately filed a Form 3 as required by law but on an attempt to present the same to the director of immigration services, he has been threatened with prosecution.

Kariuki say he has never kept his dual citizenship as he has repeatedly and with knowledge of the immigration services used his Cypriot passport while traveling in and out of Kenya for business purpose and the same has been authenticated by the official immigration stamps over 19 times, without questions being raised.

“The underlying act of obtaining dual citizenship is constitutionally ordained with no conditions and the same cannot be taken away or threatened by an inferior law as section 8,” he says in his court papers.

He says many countries deny visas to persons who have been convicted of any criminal offence and hence section 8 of the act is arbitrary.

“Strict and absolute liability offences and penalties are usually reserved for serious and grave offences and not administrative issues like disclosure of dual citizenship,” he adds.

He says most Kenyans who have acquired citizenship of other countries are afraid and apprehensive of entering Kenya, going by the punishment stipulated in the act.

He claims that obtained the Cyprus citizenship in 2016 for purposes of trade and business.

Kariuki says that if him and other Kenyans holding dual citizenship fail to report the same within three months, they are deemed to have committed an offence and are liable upon conviction to a fine not exceeding shs5 million or imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years.

He says both the constitution and the Kenya citizenship and immigration act does not provide any procedure to be followed by a Kenyan citizen by birth when seeking or obtaining a foreign citizenship.

HUDUMA REGISTRATION TO GO ON WITH NO CONDITIONS, COURT RULES.

0
Three-judge bench Weldon Korir , Pauline Nyamweha and Mumbi Ngugi delivering the ruling.

BY NT CORRESPONDENT.

No Kenyan shall be compelled to give out his or her information to officers carrying out new registration by the government.

In conditions given to the government ahead of NIIMS registration, which is set to be launched on Tuesday, a three judge bench further said no one should be denied services for lacking Huduma Number.

The court gave the government the green light to carry on with the exercise, which has been challenged by three petitioners.

“The respondents (Government) shall be liberty to collect the data and information under NIIMS. However the respondent shall not compel any member of the public to participate in the collection of personal data in NIIMS,’’ read justice Pauline Nyamweya

The three judge bench also barred the government from setting time restrictions or deadlines as regards to the information and Data in NIIMS.

The court added that the government should not set the data and collection of data in NIIMS as a condition as provision to get any governmental services or access to any services.

The government was also stopped disseminating personal data and information gathered in the process.
The information should not be shared or disseminated to or with any other national or international agencies or any other persons, the court ruled.

“While we have found that a prima facie case has been made out as with regards to stop elements of the petitioners case, we are not satisfied that a conservatory orders should be issued in the terms prayers sought by the petitioners,” the court ruled.

TRADER WHO ATTEMPTED TO DEFRAUD FIRST COMMUNITY BANK CHARGED.

0
Businessman Charles Nyakango Mengo before Milimani Court.

BY NT CORRESPONDENT.

A businessman has been charged before a Nairobi court with conspiracy to defraud Sh 12 million from First community Bank.

Charles Nyakango Mengo appeared before Milimani Senior Principal Magistrate Kennedy Cheruiyot and denied the charge.

Mengo is accused that on between April 20 and April 28 at First Community in Nairobi county jointly with others not before court conspired to defraud First Community Bank Sh12 million.

After denying the charges the accused through his lawyer urged the court to released him on reasonable cash bail as he not a flight risk.

The court heard that the matter is purely commercial as it relates to a loan the accused was grant by the bank in 2017.

Prosecution informed the court that there is another matter pending in another court where the bank managers are facing similars charges emanating to the same loan. The two case will be consolidated on May 23,2019.

The magistrate however ordered the accused person to be released on Sh 500,000 cash bail or a bond of Sh 1 million.

GALOT COMPANIES FAILS TO STOP PROSECUTION OF TOP MANAGERS.

0
Rajeev Modi, Pushpinder Singh Mann and Jophece Yego who are facing perjury charges.

BY NT CORRESPONDENT.

Attempt by Galot Group of companies to stay criminal proceedings in a criminal trial where three of it’s managers accused of perjury has failed.

This is after the trial magistrate Martha Mutuku declined to stay the proceeds against Rajeev Modi, Pushpinder Singh Mann and Jophece Yego and instead directed the parties to serve other parties to enable them respond to the application.

Galot Industries Limited, Manchester Outfitters Limited and Kingwoolen Mills Limited in their application is seeking to stay the criminal proceedings against the three senior officials pending hearing and determination.

It is also seeking to terminate the criminal proceedings against Rajeev Modi , Pushpinder Singh Mann and Jophece Yego who are facing perjury charges who are the officers of the Galot group companies.

They also want court to direct Director of Criminal investigation be immediately commence investigations into the conduct of Pravin Galot together with Michael K. Sang and Erick Murithi for making of the false report and statements precipitating the charges facing the accused persons.

They said Pravin Galot together with Michael K. Sang and Erick Murithi are not directors of Galot Companies.

Rajeev Modi , Pushpinder Singh Mann and Jophece Yego are charged that on February 26 last year at LDK House Dunga road in Nairobi county convened a meeting purportedly as directors and company secretary respectively of Galot Industries Limited and nominated Rajeev Modi so as to aid him to swear an affidavit for purpose of withdrawing criminal case Number. 276 of 2018 which is currently before the Chief Magistrates court ( city court) a fact they knew to be false.

Rajeev Modi is alone accused on March 2 last year at St George’s House Parliament road in Nairobi county falsely made oath before Alice Jonathan Gulenywa a commissioner of oaths , in an affidavit to be filed in criminal case number 276 of 2018 before city court one in an attempt to have the case withdrawn from court by purporting to be a director of Galot Industries Limited, Manchester Outfitters Limited and Kingwoollen Mills Limited.

They claimed Pravin Galot made a false report to the officers of DCI on the basis that he is a director of the companies.

They said the companies doesn’t have complaint against the accused persons.

Rthey claimed Pravin gave malicious information to the DCI officers with intention to cause Pushpinder Singh Mann and Jophece Yogo to be apprehended and charged before court knowing that the same was false.

The companies alleged Pravin has fabricated evidence that he is a Director of the said companies and he has intention of deceiving the court.

EACC OPPOSES BAIL FOR SAMBURU GOVERNOR.

0
Samburu Governor Moses Kasaine Lenolkulal.

.BY SAM ALFAN.

Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission has vehemently opposed application by Samburu Governor Moses Kasaine Lenolkulal seeking to be admitted on anticipatory bail or bond pending any arrest, investigation or prosecution.

The commission through and application by investigating officer Joel Khisa said it is investigating corruption and economic crimes , bribery , conflicts of interest involving contractors and Samburu County Government officials.

While opposing the application, EACC said the Governor has the opportunity to challenge the orders in the two matters before court issuing the application and may seek appropriate reliefs for the alleged breaches of his rights.

Khisa said it is only logical that with respect to search warrants no notice is issued to a party prior to searches being conducted as such action certainly prejudices investigations as evidence sought may be concluded or destroyed.

He said the commission acted lawfully and with due regard being at all times to the applicants constitutional rights and the allegations that he was harassed or humiliated are unfounded and made in bad faith.

EACC said Lenolkulal has nonetheless been granted an opportunity to record statements in the matter as evidenced.

The commission said the Governor apprehension in his supporting affidavit that he faces imminent arrest and charging are merely speculative and based on conjecture and investigations is still at the initial stage having recently obtained the search.

“Furthermore the outcome of those investigations is unknown at this particular stage and cannot be pre-empted by the applicant or the court hence there is no real danger of the applicant as alleged,” said Khisa.

At the same time the Director of Public Prosecution has also opposed application on grounds that Lenolkulal allegations do not meet the legal threshold for granting anticipatory bail.

Prosecution added that anticipatory can only be issued where applicant demonstrates that his fundamental rights are in danger of being seriously breached by state organ which the Governor has failed to do.

This is after the governor who is under investigations for fraud of over Sh 2 billion moved to court seeking to be admitted on bail pending his arrest and prosecution.

“This court be pleased to admit the applicant (Moses Kasaine Lenolkulal) to anticipatory bail pending any arrest , investigation or charge on terms and conditions that this court deems fit in the circumstances,”. urged Lenolkulal.

He said about February 20,2019 Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission servants, juniors , officers or persons acting under the commission’s directions invaded his residents both in Nairobi and Maralal and his office in Maralal in such of what they termed as evidence.

The governor added after search , EACC officers took him to their offices located at Integrity Centre where he bonded to appear in their offices on February 25 this year.

” When i appeared before EACC offices , i was asked to record a statement which i did and again i was bonded to appear before the same office on March 4,” said the Governor.

He added on or about March 5,2019 he learnt of haunting and unnerving information vide social media platform in Samburu County including Samburu County forum that the commission had obtained orders freezing his bank account.

“Upon carrying out internal investigations , i came to learn that indeed the commission had obtained orders vide miscellaneous criminal application No. 979 of 2019 to freeze and investigate my banks five bank accounts held at Kenya Commercial Bank,” said the Governor.

Lenolkulal argued that he is apprehensive that EACC in conjunction with Inspector General of police and Director of Public Prosecution are planning to arrest and detain him on frivolous and tramped up charges aimed at harassing, humiliating and disparaging him in utter violation of his rights.

He claimed he is a man of good reputation who has wrongly been subjected to public ridicule which meets the agenda of the EACC and any further action by the commission or IG and DPP will greatly undermine his right to human dignity.

The governor says that he once admitted to bail, he undertake to continue co-operating with the commission in the event they take decision to charge him and avail himself in court.

APPEAL COURT ACQUITS MAN FACING 15 YEARS IMPRISONMENT ON DEFILEMENT.

0
Court of Appeal Patrick Kiage who is among thre judge bench who set free a man jailed for 15 years over defilement of 17 year girl.

BY NT CORRESPONDENT.

Court of Appeal has set free a man jailed for 15 years over defilement of minor.

In their Judgement Justice Roselyn Naliaka Nambuye, Daniel Musinga, Patrick Kiage set aside trial court decision that sentenced Eliud Waweru Wambui to 15 years imprisonment for the offence.

The three appellate judges while overturning the lower court decision that the conviction was not safe given the full circumstances of the case and the sentence clearly imposed on the basis of a mandatory minimum was clearly harshly and excessive.

“We allow the appeal, quash the conviction and set aside the sentence. The appellant shall be set at liberty forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held,” ruled the judges.

They further concurred with the trial court erred by failing to consider evidence to fresh scrutiny, reevaluate the evidence tabled before it and analyze as required of it.

The three Judges noted that our prisons are teeming with young men serving lengthy sentences for having had sexual intercourse with adolescent girls who consent has been held to be immaterial because they were under 18 years .

“The wisdom and justice of this unfolding tragedy calls for serious interrogation,” said the judges.

They also said that a candid national conversation on this sensitive yet important issue implicating the challenges of maturing, morality, autonomy, protection of children and the need for proportionally is long overdue.

Waweru had been charged that on the month of May 2009 at Makuyu township in Muranga county he committed an act with a 17 and 5 months year old girl.

He further faced an alternative charge that on the diverse dates from January 2009 and November 16 ,2009 at Makuyu township in Muranga he committed an indecent act with 17 year and 5 months girl.

He had denied the charges and prosecution called five witnesses where upon conclusion of the case, the trial magistrate found Waweru had a case to answer.

Trial magistrate Senior Principal Magistrate L. M. Wachira found the main charge was proved against Waweru and convicted to 15 years imprisonment.

Waweru was aggrieved by the decision of the trial court before the high court but justice Achode dismissed it in the year 2014.

He filed the memorandum of appeal before the appellate court on the ground that the court erred in law and fact by failing to notice the ingredients of the offence as charged were not proved.

Waweru said there were material errors in the prosecution evidence contained in exhibit one in that the date of issue of the birth certificate took place before complaint was born and there was likelihood that the charges against him were borne out of malice and ill-will due to the fact he failed to pay the compensation as required by the girl.

He also argued that the court erred by failing to notice that the appellant reasonably believed that the complaint had granted her consent and that she had granted the said consent and believed she was of full age and capacity to contract a marriage.

Waweru added that the fact that the complaint was school going girl did not itself mean that she was under the age of 18 years.

He said the local chief is said to have led some negotiations between the appellant and the complaint’s father which did not bear fruit because the appellant did not have the money demanded ” it is not possible that the complainant was under age and the chief could
not possibly have actively condoned an illegality.

He thus submitted Waweru said the the girl must have decided to “to fix” him for failing to part with the sum of money requested”

Waweru said the complaint presented herself to him as mature girl who was ripe for marriage and she indeed testified that she and he were married.

“The mere fact that the complainant made the appellant her boyfriend had sex by consent several times and was willing to get married to the appellant shows that the complainant presented herself before the appellant as a mature girl ready to get married.

After the parents of the complainant were made aware of the same, they approached the appellant for discussions of the way forward and if the appellant had agreed to pay the sum requested they would not have reported. It is clear therefore that the charges facing the appellant were driven by ill will and vendetta for non payment of Sh 80,000.00,” observed judges