Blog Page 333

MEN WHO STRIPPED WOMAN SENTENCED TO DEATH.

0
A driver, conductor of a Githurai bus and a petrol station attendant Nicholas Mwangi, Meshack Mburu Mwangi and Edward Ndungu Kamau to suffer death for the charge of robbery with violence before A Nairobi Court on Wednesday July 19,2017/ PHOTO BY S. A. N.
BY SAM ALFAN.
Three men who stripped a woman provoking demonstrations dubbed ‘my dress my choice’ in have been sentenced to death.
A driver, conductor of a Githurai bus and a petrol station attendant accused of stripping and sexually assaulting a female passenger and robbing her in 2014 have been found guilty.
Chief Magistrate Francis Andayi sentenced the three accused person Nicholas Mwangi, Meshack Mburu Mwangi and Edward Ndungu Kamau to suffer death for the charge of robbery with violence.
They have also been sentenced to serve 25years in prison. However, that sentence has been set aside due to the first sentence.
CM Andayi has said in his judgement that It is important to respect the decency of women.
He has added that from the evidence provided in court it was clear that the lady was alert and in her full senses and was aware of what happened to her.
The three were charged with sexually assaulting a woman on September 19 2014 at Millennium petrol Station in Githurai 44 and another count of robbing the victim items amounting to 41,700 shillings.
“It is important to respect all human being because we are all equal and even more important to respect a woman not to humiliate or harass a woman,” he said.
Twelve witnesses testified in the case.
In mitigation, the accused persons pleaded for leniency on grounds that they have been behind bars for three years with pump attendant indicating that he is a family man who is the sole breadwinner of his wife and two kids.

WIPER LEADER KALONZO MUSYOKA OUTWITS RAILA IN PRESIDENTIAL RACE PACT.

0
NASA principal and wiper leader Kalonzo Musyoka who wants his foundation accounts unfrozen.

BY THOMAS KARIUKI.

EDITOR, NAIROBI TIMES.

Call it what you may; democracy, consensus or independence, but NASA flag bearer Raila Odinga was hoodwinked by his coalition principals and this is how.

Looking at the events that presumed the announcement of the NASA’s flag bearer, you could think that ODM suitors outwitted their counterparts into agreeing that Odinga carries the day but a little look into the core of the agreement, it is sad to note that Raila’s henchmen scored A’s in all areas except one window that could/maybe exploited.

I agree that I also got it wrong on this one and pester the gods for forgiveness from the former vice president Kalonzo Musyoka on this one alone. However, I stand with all I outlined earlier as true, nothing else but the truth.

In the accord signed by the four principals leave alone Isaac Ruto, it was agreed that each party should have its own candidates for governorship, senatorial, Member of Parliament, Women Representative and Member of County Assembly.

This means that, all parties in the NASA coalition derive their strength from their candidates and thus can stand on their own if their interests are not satisfied in the coalition.

What does this mean?

Allow me to remind you of a statement made by Kalonzo Musyoka before Raila was made NASA flagbearer. “I will be in the government that will be in power in 2017.”

Although he has always wanted voters to believe that the government he is talking about is NASA government the fact that he leaves out which government will be in power leaves a lot to be desired. But, Kalonzo is saying this; he will not stay in the cold for five more years, he will be in the government whether NASA or Jubilee.

Going back to the agreement, I beg to understand why Kalonzo outrightly allowed Raila to be the Presidential candidate and him the running mate without a sweat.

Did Kalonzo just play it safe or is he deriving his strength from the opposition for superior bargaining power?

In event that Raila doesn’t make it to be Kenya’s President, Kalonzo will jump ship to the other side taking with him candidates from his own party and will also have a higher bargaining agreement with the government that will be in power.

If Raila wins, Kalonzo will also be in the government bringing his candidates along plus the cord that binds him to Raila, NASA.

The same case for Wetangula and Musalia Mudavadi; this principals outwitted the old man and as they say, he who laughs last, laughs better.

CORRUPTION CASE AGAINST CITY HALL CHIEF OF STAFF TERMINATED.

0
Nairobi County Chief of Staff George Wainaina and Nairobi senator Mike Sonko who accused Wainaina for attempting to bribe him to stop documenting how the said senior officers are constructing private and development houses using public fund.
BY SAM ALFAN.

High Court has terminated  Corruption case against Nairobi County Chief of staff George Wainaina Ndungu.

The court ruled that charges leveled against Wainaina were an abuse of the court process and the criminal justice system.

Justice  Joseph Onguto further prohibited the Anti-corruption court from continuing with the corruption trial which commenced early last year.

The Judge agreed with submissions issued by Wainaina that the role of Senator Mike Mbuvi Sonko in the investigations leading to his arrest was more than that of a complainant.

Wainaina was charged with with offense of attempting to bribe the Senator 1million shillings.

He later moved to the high court to challenge his prosecution on grounds that at the time EACC recommended his prosecution there were no commissioners or chairperson in office.

Embattled Nairobi County Chief of Staff sensationally claimed that Nairobi senator Mike Sonko allegedly solicited Sh 7 million from him in order to drop corrupt charges against him.

Through his lawyer James Ochieng’,Wainina claims that the process of prosecuting him was unconstitutional.

In his documents filed in the high court, seeking to stay the criminal proceedings against him, he has faulted Director of Public Prosecution and Ethics and Anti-corruption commission for failing to conduct proper investigations.

In his court documents, County official claim’s the city politician tried to solicit the money through Nairobi TNA party chairman John Njoroge and Brian Kamau Mugo.

According to the documents, the two intimated they had been requested and authorized by the senator broker and resolve the dispute.

“The two floated a figure of Shs7 million payments to the politician to facilitate the withdrawal of the bribery case facing Wainaina” state the documents.

Wainaina added the two also called his brother namely Moses Wainaina Njogu and John Gichua Njogu with the same proposal.

He said the decision of DPP and EACC at the instigation of Senator Sonko to arrest and prosecute him without proper investigations and making public disparaging press statements without evidence is aimed as a criminal besmirching as a the chief of staff.

“The findings of the respondents are not based on any factual information based on investigations” argues Wainaina.

He accused the office of Director of Public Prosecution of abusing powers following a decision to arrest and prosecute him hence violating of his constitutional rights and freedom.

George Wainaina Njogu was accused of bribing Nairobi Senator Mike Sonko to stop documenting how the said senior officers are constructing private and development houses using public fund.

Wainaina is accused that on January 5, 2016 at Kenyatta International Conference Center at Senator Hon Mike Sonko office being a person employed by a public body by Nairobi County Government as Chief OF Staff corruptly offered benefit of Kshs,1,000,000 to senator Mike Sonko as an inducement for him to stop pursuing the matter where he had invited the media to accompany him in documenting how the said senior officers are constructing private and development houses using public fund, a matter relating to the affair’s of the said public body.

He denied all the charges and Principal Magistrate Felix Kombo released him on bond of Sh2million or a Sh800, 000 cash bail or remains in custody until his grafts case is heard and determined.

AFRICOG ASKS COURT TO COMPEL IEBC TO MAKE PUBLIC THE VOTER REGISTER.

0
AFRICOG Executive Director Gladwell Otieno who want electoral body compelled to make the voters register public.

BY SAM ALFAN.

A voter wants the IEBC compelled to make public the voters register before elections.

Executive Director  Gladwell Otieno of Africog is seeking enough time for the public to peruse the register before elections.

Ms Otieno argues that section 6 of the Election Act and Regulations 33 of the Elections requires that the register of voters be opened up for inspection by voters 90 days before the election.

Africog also wants the court to prohibit IEBC from deploying a voter register for use in the general election slated for 8th August before it is subjected to public inspection as required under the law.

The Civil Society organisation further holds that there are noted inconsistencies in numbers declared by IEBC adding that the actual number of registered voters is not certain in some regions.

Ms Otieno says that an inspection of the register will enable voters scrutinize and ascertain the actual registered voters in their areas of concern.

In a certificate of urgency, the petitioner says that the continued non observance of the provisions of the law by Chebukati led commission constitute a threat to the rights and freedoms to have a free and fair election.

WE SHOULD HAVE A BACKUP VOTER IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM, JUBILEE TELLS OFF OPPOSITION.

0
Milimani Law Court.

BY SAM ALFAN.

Battle lines have been drawn yet again pitting Jubilee Party (JP) and opposition NASA over what voter technology should be used to identify a voter.

Jubilee Party through its legal officer holds that both electronic and manual voter identification should be used whereas their competitors want only the electronic voter identification device otherwise called EVID.

Voter identification was a key agenda in talks that saw the ouster of former IEBC commissioners.

In their response in a suit where the opposition is seeking to have electronic systems exclusively used to identify voters and transmit results, Jubilee party says that failure of Biometric voter Registration systems and EVID systems should not be a basis of disenfranchising eligible voters.

JP Director of Legal Affairs Ms Mary Karen Soroboit, says that the opposition is trying to legislate its electoral agenda through the courts and should not be allowed to do so in view of the doctrine of separation of powers.

The court was told that the least it can do is to have provision for a back-up manual system in case the electronic system fails as has happened previously.

In the 2013 General Election, the systems failed because of faulty supply of power and the systems navigation among other shortcomings.

“The insistence on using electronic transmission as the only mode of transmission or identifying voters will thus be setting up the country on the reliance of an unreliable, insecure mode of transmission of results,” argues Jubilee

On the other hand the opposition argues that IEBC is time-barred to come up with regulations establishing complementary mechanism for the elections as required by law.

“Section 109 of the Elections Act (2011) requires that the mechanism and regulations to be put in place with the approval of Parliament at least 60 days before the General Election,”

“There is hardly time to design effective complementary system that can be verified by all concerned parties,” said Nasa through its legal representative Prof Tom Sihanya.

LADY BITES FRIEND’S LIP FOR GOING OUT WITH HER BOYFRIEND.

0
Lip's /Photo courtesy.
BY SAM ALFAN
A furious lady was charged for biting her friend’s lip after finding out that she was having an illicit affair with her boyfriend.
Esther Waithera was accused that on June 24 at Embakasi area in Nairobi, she beat Lucy Mbadi and injured her body.
Waithera and Mbadi are friends and even run a grocery business together.
On the said day, the accused opened her business but she was gloomy.
Mbadi asked her if she had a problem and she reluctantly asked why Mbadi had snatched her boyfriend.
A quarrel ensued but they later calmed down and continued with selling fruits.
Police said Waithera, while seated, started accusing the complainant had blocked her way.
“She pulled her down and started beating her on the face.”
“The accused also scratched her face and went on to bite her friend’s lower lip warning her never to kiss her boyfriend again,” the police said.
Mbadi was rescued by good Samaritans who came to separate the two and rushed the complainant to a nearby clinic.
She was treated and later reported the case after which investigations were launched leading to the arrest of the accused.
Waithera denied the charges before chief magistrate Heston Nyaga and prayed for lenient cash bail.
Nyaga released her on a cash bail of Sh10,000.Trial to proceed on October 30.

GRANDFATHER CLAIMS INNOCENCE IN RAPE CASE DECISION.

0
Prison.

BY SAM ALFAN.

A six year old has gotten justice at last with the man she knew as her grandfather being jailed for life for sexually abusing her.

Joseph Muriithi Macharia appeal to have a 10 years imprisonment quashed was dismissed by the high court and sentenced to life.

“The sentence of ten years imposed on the appellant was not lawful. The lawful sentence which the magistrate ought to have imposed is imprisonment for life based on the age of the victim. I will therefore interfere with the sentence. I set aside the sentence of ten years. The appellant is sentenced to imprisonment for life,” ruled judge Lucy Gitari

The indecent act happened in October 3 2014 when Macharia sent for the girl.

It was after the girl had overstayed at her grandfather that the mother decided to find out what may have caused her delay only to find her father in the act on her daughter.

Angrily, she grab her daughter from ‘the animal’ and later reported the matter to Kiangwaci Police Post.

Her daughter was then taken to Katarina Hospital for treatment.

In his defense the grandfather said that he was being fixed for an act he did not commit.

He stated that on the material day he was digging near his house when children went to play near his home.

The children damaged his sweet potatoes which angered him.

He then probed from the children who had damaged the sweet potatoes.

The children started blaming each other.

The mother of the child went and started making a lot of noise and claimed that no sweet potatoes had been damaged.

She told him it were better if he is the one who had died other than his wife.

He got annoyed and went to report the matter to the Police.

When he reached the station, he found the mother at the Police Station.

He was then arrested and charged in court.

HEARING OF MURDER CASE AGAINST BRITON BUSINESSMAN SET FOR AUGUST 25.

0
British businessman Richard Alden who facing murder charge before high court criminal court in Nairobi.
BY SAM ALFAN.
 

The High Court Criminal Division has directed a case in which former Wananchi Group CEO Richard Alden is accused of murdering his girlfriend in Karen estate to be heard from August 25 without further delay.

Trial judge Jessie Lessit fixed the hearing dates after the defence lawyer Pravin Bowry told the court that he is ready to proceed with the trial since his client wants the matter heard expeditiously.

He told the court that he is currently jobless with no source of income.

“The accused desires to proceed with the hearing since he’s in the country without a job or any source of income” Boris told the court.

The case failed to proceed last week after Richard was told that the trial judge was attending a judicial forum in Mombasa.

Alden through his lawyer Pravin Bowry, told the trial court that he is ready to proceed with his trial and blamed the prosecution for delaying the trial.

Last month  DPP withdrew the criminal case which he was accused of having a firearm without a license.

While applying to withdraw the case DPP told the court the want to withdraw the matter to allow further investigations over the matter.

Mr Alden was arrested after investigators ruled out an initial report that the woman had shot herself while playing with a pistol.

Prosecution through Ms Catherine Mwaniki , had opposed the bond had told the trial court that the suspect “cannot be trusted” as he gave conflicting accounts following the fatal incident.

JUDGE PULLS OUT FROM HEARING FELLOW JUDGES’ CASE.

0
High Court Judge John Mativo /PHOTO BY S. A. N.

BY SAM ALFAN.

High court Judge has disqualified himself from hearing a case in which businessman Kamlesh Pattni wants court to clear his name over involvement in the alleged misconduct that led to the sacking of Justice Joseph Mutava.

Justice John Mativo said that Judge Mutava is known to him adding that it will not be proper for him to hear and determine the matter.

“It will not be proper for me to hear the matter I therefore recuse myself, “Mativo ruled.

The matter will now be mentioned before Justice Chacha Mwita for further directions.

In the matter Pattni, argues that the tribunal that investigated Justice Mutava did not give him a chance to defend himself and went ahead to make recommendations that adversely affected his business.

He wants a declaration that the findings were a violation of his rights to be heard, and any reference to him or his businesses be expunged from the findings.

Pattni accused the tribunal of going beyond their mandate to investigate his reputation.

BACKGROUND OF THE CASE.

Justice Mutava has filed a case seeking Supreme Court to quash the recommendations by a seven-member tribunal to the president Uhuru Kenyatta that he be removed from office for alleged misconduct.

“The tribunal lacked jurisdiction to conduct any investigations against the petitioner since it was unconstitutionally constituted and, therefore, any recommendations arrived at by the tribunal are void,” lawyer Philip Nyachoti says in the petition lodged in the Supreme Court yesterday.

The lawyer argued that the tribunal’s findings, which were handed over to President Uhuru Kenyatta on September 21, were based on complaints that had been voluntarily withdrawn, that the complainants did not give evidence and that third parties purported to fix him.

The tribunal concluded that three specific allegations regarding the manner in which he quashed the Sh5.7 billion criminal case against Goldenberg suspect Kamlesh Pattni had been proved since they amounted to gross misconduct.

“The judgment in the Pattni case has never been reversed by any court of law despite there being mechanisms available to any parties in the form of an appeal,” Nyachoti said in the petition.

Mutava was found culpable of having influenced retired High Court Judge Leonard Njagi to rule in favor of Sehit Investments Ltd in a Sh200million property dispute with businesswoman Josephine Onyango. The retired Judicial officer is said to have received a text message from Justice Mutava on September 6, 2012 to communicate the request.

Pattni had petitioned the High Court to terminate the case on July 26, 2012 after the Director of Public Prosecutions, Keriako Tobiko, had dismissed his plea-bargain request. The Judge gave orders blocking Tobiko’s decision and suspended all criminal proceedings relating to findings by the Commission of Inquiry into the Goldenberg scandal.

The Supreme Court, once it is re-constituted, will be asked to invalidate the tribunal’s recommendations on the basis that the appointment of its members was irregular. The first five members were appointed on May 30, 2013 and the other two on June 17, 2013. The President is required to appoint the entire team within 14 days after receiving the complaints from the Judicial Service Commission (JSC).

The High Court had restrained the tribunal from investigating the Judge on June 28, 2013 on the basis that the JSC had not accorded him a fair hearing. On February 17, 2014, the three-Judge bench declared the tribunal incompetent since two of its members had been appointed beyond the 14-day statutory deadline.

The Court of Appeal, in a judgment delivered on May 8, last year, reversed the High Court decision and directed the tribunal to carry out its mandate. Justice Mutava was aggrieved by the decision and lodged a notice of appeal to the Supreme Court on May 21, last year.

Justice Mutava, who was appointed a Judge of the High Court on August 23, 2011,was suspended on May 30, 2013 on the recommendation of theJSC after its sub-committee, chaired by Supreme Court Judge Smokin Wanjala, cleared him of eight allegations but found sufficient evidence against him on three complaints of corruption and misconduct.

THERE IS NO TIME FOR FRESH TENDERING, IEBC TELLS COURT.

0
High Court three judges bench led by presiding Judge George Odunga Joel Ngugi and John Mativo delivering a judgement on Friday July 7,2017.

BY SAM ALFAN

After vowing to appeal a court decision cancelling ballot printing tender, the IEBC has told a higher court that the decision failed to link public participation in direct tendering.

On Friday Justices Joel Ngugi, George Odunga and John Mativo on canceled the tender awarded to Al Ghurair Printing and Publishing Company on grounds that there was no public participation.

In an appeal lodged today, IEBC says the Judges erred in finding public participation was mandatory to direct procurement conducted pursuant to the provisions of the public procurement and asset disposal act 2015.

The three Judges, it says failed to apply the principle of harmonious interpretation of the constitution when considering the provisions of article 10 and 227 of the constitution.

Lawyer Kamau Karuri for IEBC says that the Judges erred in law when they directed the electoral body to craft a program of Public Participation to Operationalize article 10 of the constitution.

“The judges were in effect directing IEBC to asurp parliament role of legislative,” records in court documents.

The lower court erred the moment they asurped the constitutional functional autonomy of IEBC to set operational programs including the timetable for procurement of elections materials.

IEBC also claims that the three Judges were misguided with the assumption that there was still time available to procure the election materials without any factual basis disregarding their professional assessment.

While delivering the judgement on Friday, The three judges bench led by presiding Judge Joel Ngugi ,Justice George Odunga and John Mativo they directed the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) to start the tendering process afresh.

They said that the commission, as an independent body, should have engaged all presidential candidates in the decision leading to the choice of Al Ghurair printing  & Publishing through direct procurement.

They, however, declined to cancel the printing of the other ballots for the Member of County Assembly, Member of the National Assembly, senator and governor slots because there was no dispute concerning them.

In their ruling, the judges said the commission had failed to ensure public participation in awarding the tender to Al Ghurair as required by the law.

“It is necessary to ensure that election systems are free, fair and transparent. The systems should be secure and results announced promptly.

Appropriate structures should be put in place to avoid electoral malpractice,” they ruled. The judges also rejected an application by IEBC lawyers led by Fred Ngatia for a stay of execution pending appeal on Monday saying those aggrieved by the ruling can seek redress in the Court of Appeal.

They argued that it is not impossible for IEBC to start the process again in order to conduct free, fair and credible election.

The judges, however, dismissed claims by the opposition National Super Alliance (Nasa) that the firm met President Uhuru Kenyatta and could thus have influenced the award of the tender.

“We have not seen any evidence that there was a meeting between the President and the officials of Al-Ghurair, newspapers cuttings are insufficient to be used as evidence in a matter and therefore the allegations by Nasa that there was a meeting between president and Al-Ghurair is below threshold,” they said.

Proceedings resume.