Blog Page 241

IT IS WITHIN MY POWERS TO REVIEW LAWYER NYAKUNDI’S CASE; DPP SAYS.

0
City lawyer Assa Nyakundi before Makandara Law Courts on Thursday April 25,2019.

BY SAM ALFAN.

Director of Criminal Investigation George Kinoti is investigating conspiracy to defeat justice against the wife of lawyer Assa Nyakundi, who is accused of shooting his son dead.

This is after Lydia Kunga Nyakundi filed a petition challenging DPP’s move to withdraw manslaughter charge against Nyakundi. She has protested against the decision saying she was not consulted as a victim.

In the response to the petition, Corporal Reuben Mwaniki attached to DCI headquarters told the court that the crime scene reconstruction report , ballistic report and accused persons statements clearly demonstrate the bullet trajectory and details a scenario which requires further analysis for an appropriate decision.

“I believe that the decision to review the charges constitutionally placed upon Director of Public Prosecution Noordin Haji and Lydia Kunga Nyakundi is a prosecution witness is not objective to determine when and how charges should be reviewed,” said Cpl Mwaniki.

He added that the Lydia being wife to the accused person and the mother of deceased is a competent and compellable witness under the Evidence Act and DPP has not infringed on her right during the period of the investigation. He said the DPP has no intention of doing so.

The detective in his affidavit told the court several that prosecution witnesses have recorded their statement including Noah Onsumu Nyakundi an advocate and brother to the deceased, Titus Ogamba Nyakundi, an uncle to the deceased and who are also victims.

He dismissed the petition and the application saying it has no legal or factual basis.

DCI and DPP said that the substratum of the petition is premised on media, innuendo, conjecture, rumours, suspicion which are not attributed to them at all and which cannot be the basis for grant of any of the orders she has sought.

They said the lawyer’s wife has failed to demonstrate how the DPP and DCI have breached or threatened to breach her rights and that she is only inviting the court to unjustly interfere with and usurp the constitutional powers.

He said application should be dismissed with costs and the criminal trial against Nyakundi allowed to proceed to its logical conclusion.

“The orders sought for a declaration that there was selective omission to investigate is not supported by evidence,” he said.

The DPP told the court there is no live grievance between lawyer’s wife and DCI for calling for intervention of the court.

Through Senior Prosecutor Henry Kinyanjui, prosecution told the court the notice of motion does not disclose a prima facie case to warrant issuance of the orders sought.

ELACHI RETAINS SEAT AFTER LABOUR COURT CONFIRMS HER AS NAIROBI COUNTY SPEAKER.

0
Nairobi City County assembly Speaker Beatrice Elachi.

BY SAM ALFAN

Nairobi City County assembly Speaker Beatrice Elachi retains her job after Employment and Labour relations court has dismissed a decision by City County Assembly members to impeach her.

In her ruling, Justice Maureen Onyango also restrained the assembly from interfering with the terms of employment of Elachi as the speaker of Nairobi City County Assembly in consequence of the unlawful purported impeachment of September 6,2018.

The County Assembly and Nairobi County Government were furtger prohibited from carrying out a process to remove Elachi without complying with the law, Constitution, due process and according her a hearing without following applicable standing orders.

The judge further declared decision by Nairobi City County Assembly whole house committee purporting to impeach Beatrice Elachi as the county assembly speaker as breach of the constitution and her constitutional rights under Article 27 27(1) , 27(2), 27(3) , 41, 47(1) and 50 of the constitution.

The court also issued injunction prohibiting the county assembly and it members or any person under it behest from entertaining or debating any motion to remove Elachi through process in violation of fair administration and without due process accorded to her in breach of the right to a hearing vested in her.

Justice Onyango ruled that the purported committee of the whole house of the county assembly sitting on the afternoon of September 6,2018 had no powers or jurisdiction to impeach speaker Elachi without due process being accorded.

The judge found that the assembly violated Article 10(2) regarding principles and values of good governance and article 47(1) regarding the the speaker’s right to an efficient, lawful and procedurally fair administrative action in her impeachment.

The judge added that the assembly was aware the speaker could not make it on time for proceedings when they summoned her while she was in Mombasa.

Elachi last year petitioned after she was impeached by the MCAs of Nairobi county assembly.

Through lawyer Harrison Kinyanjui, Elachi told court that during her impeachment, she was in Malindi for a devolution seminar presided over by Deputy President William Ruto.

BLOW TO KIDERO AS JUDGE REJECTS PLEA TO STOP GRAFT TRIAL.

0
Former Nairobi Governor Evans Kidero before Milimani Anti-Corruption Court.

BY SAM ALFAN.

Former Nairobi Governor Evans Kidero has suffered a major blow after high court dismissed his application seeking to stop corruption charges before the trial court.

High Court Anti-Corruption Justice John Onyiego dismissed application for stay the proceedings and set aside stay orders issued before on May 2,2019.

“The application for stay is hereby dismissed and orders of stay issued on May 2, 2019 lifted. The original file be forwarded to the trial court for hearing to proceed as scheduled”, ordered Onyiego.

The judge further ordered the parties to fast track hearing of the appeal so as to determine the outstanding issues.

He said he didn’t find any sufficient to stay of proceedings pending before lower court on account of misjoinder , duplicity or defective charge sheet as there is no prejudice likely ti be suffered even if the trial proceeded before the appeal is heard.

The judge further said the issue of overloaded charge sheet with over 35 counts is arguable ground of appeal but that alone cannot stop the entire hearing process which is due to start.

Judge Onyiego said regarding the offences touching on tax evasion, Kidero is not a victim of the same hence can not purport to represent the interests of the other accused persons.

Kidero together with other 10 accused persons were arraigned before Nairobi Chief Magistrate court on August 9,2018 facing various corruption charges.

Kidero is accused that on diverse dates between January 16,2014 and January 25,2016 within Nairobi County jointly conspired to commit corruption namely fraud leading to loss of public funds Shillings 213,327,3000 for services not rendered.

He is also facing charges dealing with suspects.

INTRIGUES AS CELEBRITY FIGHTS CUSTODY OF CHILD IN ENGLAND AND KENYA COURTS.

0
Musician Shiv Singh Benawra who is fighting for full custody of his four year old son./PHOTO BY S.A.N.

BY SAM ALFAN.

A Kenyan celebrity fighting for full custody of his son has accused his estranged wife of subjecting the minor to violence.

Shiv Singh Benawra was granted custody by a Milimani children court against the child’s mother, Charlotte Victoria Morris.

The court granted the musician full custody of his son in 2016 “the plaintiff shall have the minor’s actual and physical custody pending hearing and determination of the case”, ordered the Nairobi Children Court.

Senior Resident Magistrate B. Kituyi further ordered that the minor should not leave jurisdiction (Kenya) of the court.

The court allowed the mother to access the minor while in Kenya.

“The minor’s access by defendant (Charlotte Victoria Morris) should be in Kenya and should be supervised by this court pending hearing and determination of the case”, ordered the court.

In April 2017, the children court issued another order restraining the father from taking the minor out of Kenya to another country pending hearing and conclusion of the case.

The two used to live in the United Kingdom before separating when the child was a year old.

Shiv moved back to Kenya where he has a stable income.

Through lawyer Danstan Omari, Shiv filed the case before a children’s court claiming the mother exposed the minor to violence.

He further said the minor was in dire need of care and protection. According to photos seen by NairobiTimez in the court file , they show the biting on the boy’s neck which is claimed to be caused by the mother’s boyfriend.

“Unless this matter is disposed and determined on a priority basis and ex parte orders granted on the principle of the best interest of the child, irreparable damage and prejudice will be occasioned ion the child,” Benawra stated in an affidavit.

According to Senior Resident Magistrate B. Kituyi, the minor’s access by his mother should be in Kenya and should be supervised by the court pending the hearing by all parties.

Shiv in court documents argues that Charlotte has no permanent place of abode and therefore cannot be trusted with the minor.

He accuses her of having no interest of the minor at heart and only uses the child to extort money from him.

Charlotte allegedly had a horrible upbringing as she suffered both mentally and physically in the hands of her parents who were also not well-off.

One day after a disagreement between them, she was sent to the UK to stay with her father.

Since Charlotte’s dad was sick and the two were surviving on the benefits he was getting which was not enough, Shiv would occasionally visit and send her upkeep money.

The two started dating dating online before getting married in Kenya in 2013 after Shiv’s mother sent Charlotte a flight ticket to come back to Kenya.

However the two then love birds travelled to India for a few years after their honeymoon and later to the UK where the minor was born.

She came back to Kenya for 10 days but she did not want anybody from Shiv’s family to touch the child since she did not want the minor to be brought up in an Indian Kenyan decent rather as a British citizen.

After their separation, he came back to Kenya and would visit his child occasionally.

They had a child arrangement order issued by the family court at Chelmsford England which allowed neither parent to remove the minor from England and Wales for a period exceeding 28 days without prior written consent of the other or in default of agreement and order of the court. The extension could be granted for 60 days.

After their separation, Shiv took the minor to Kenya with Charlotte’s permission for a period of 60 days but is allegedly yet to return him.

During this time Charlotte was staying with her boyfriend and had just separated with him and therefore did not have anywhere to stay.

She gave out the child in order to allow her settle down again.

Shiv decided to fight for custody after noticing how unstable Charlotte was and in addition, the minor had been assaulted by the so-called boyfriend.

He is pleading with the court to grant him full access to the minor as he has already enrolled him in a good school, has good housing, toys and a child friendly environment.

FOUR WHO ASSAULTED A COMRADE CHARGED WITH ASSAULT.

0
Robert Omwenga Momanyi, Collins Orina Neriko ,Stephen Kimeu Barisa, Stanley Rimbere Kithia who are accused of assaulting a university student before Milimani Law Courts on Monday May 6,2019./PHOTO BY S.A.N.

BY NT CORRESPONDENT.

Four men caught on a camera assaulting a University Students have been charged before a Nairobi Court.

Robert Omwenga Momanyi, Collins Orina Neriko ,Stephen Kimeu Barisa, Stanley Rimbere Kithia appeared before Milimani Chief Magistrate Martha Mutuku and pleaded not guilty to assaults charges.

They are accused that on the night of May 1, at Estate 24 along Kirichwa road at Kilimani area Nairobi county, jointly with others before court unlawfully did grievous harm to Kelvin Mango Odour.

Collins Orina Neriko alone was further charged that on May 1, 2019 at estate 24 in Kilimani area in Nairobi county, willfully and unlawfully destroyed IPhone XS max valued at Sh 160,000 the property of Kelvin Odour Mango.

They were released on a cash of 300,000 and bond 500,00 each.

The case was fixed for hearing on June ,13.

Court issued production order for the fifth accused person who is said to have have been charged before a Kibera court.

CITY BUSINESSMAN FAILS IN BID TO UNFREEZE ACCOUNTS AND PROPERTIES ASSOCIATED WITH HIM.

0
Businessman businessman Joseph Wanjohi and and his wife Jane Wambui Wanjiru before court./FILE PHOTO.

BY NT CORRESPONDENT.

City businessman Joseph Wanjohi and a companies associated with him has lost bid to lift preservation orders prohibiting them from withdrawing 10.5 million from their accounts and transfer of properties claimed to be proceeds of crime.

 
This is after high court Anti-Corruption judge John Onyiego dismissed the application filed by Joseph Wanjohi , his wife Jane Wambui Wanjiru and Sidjoe Manufacturers and Suppliers seeking to lift prohibition orders obtained by Assets Recovery Agency last year barring them from transacting , withdrawing , transferring over 10 million and the property.
 
The judge said that it was unfortunate that the law has set a low bar of proof of evidence for a party to obtain exparte orders and even retention of the same by the court. “That being the law, a court can only sympathise with situation but enforce the law at such a low bar based on reasonable suspicion”,.
 
 
“This court is satisfied that exparte orders were regularly and lawfully issued and that there are no sufficient reasons to warrant variation to review of the same. Accordingly , application dated December 10,2018 is hereby with no orders as to costs”, ruled Judge Onyiego.
 
On November last year, High Court issued orders restraining businessman and two companies from withdrawing 10.5 million from their accounts.

Anti-Corruption court further ordered the businessman to surrender his two luxury cars to the Director of Criminal Investigation George Kinoti within seven days failure to which DCI should seize and detain them.

Justice Hedwig Ong’undi issued orders barring Joseph Wanjohi ,Jane Wambui Wanjiku , Sidjoe Manufacturers and suppliers and Marudiono zone Limited from transferring , transacting , withdrawing , using  and other dealing in respect of funds held at Barclays Bank Muthaiga and Barclay’s Bank Moi Avenue.

“Kshs. 10,013,187,60 held in account in the name of Sidjoe Manufacturers and suppliers held at Barclays Bank Muthaiga North Branch Nairobi”. Ordered Judge Ong’undi.

The court also issued preservation barring businessman Joseph Wanjohi from transferring or withdrawing the money in his account.

” Kshs. 575,882,20 held in account in the name of Joseph Wanjohi held at Barclays Bank Moi Avenue branch , Nairobi”. Court further ordered.

The presiding judge further issued orders restraining transfer or sale of two luxury cars Range Rover KBU 950W and Mercedes Benz KCD 299H both registered under the name of Joseph Wanjohi.

The businessman was ordered to surrender the motor vehicles specified to the Director of Criminal Investigation Headquarters within seven days.

Mr Wanjohi was ordered to surrender th original logbooks of the motor vehicles to Asset Recovery Agency.

“In the event the respondents fail to surrender the above motor vehicles as specified , the Director of Criminal Investigation George Kinoti is hereby ordered to seize and detain the motor vehicles specified under order 3 above”. Ordered Judge Ong’undi.

Wanjohi in their application said said their business has stalled as a consequence of the frozen accounts thus jeopardizing their business transactions. They further contended that the preservation orders obtained against the application was open ended without a time frame within which investigations were to be conducted thus jeopardising their business.

They also claimed that majority of their assets preserved were acquired before the year 2099 to 2018 the period alleged that they had received money from illegal activities.  They added that the alleged orders granted were previously the subject of preservation orders before the magistrate’s court for three months since August 28,2018.

Wanjohi, his wife and the company dismissed and termed the allegations that they had been depositing cash in tranches of below shillings one million to avoid detection and questioning by the central bank of Kenya as a non starter.

“Regarding the drinks seized from their home , the applicants averred that they have been since been returned to them as the same constitute genuine import business. Touching on motor vehicle vehicle KBU 940W , the applicants stated that the property does not exist as it was involved in a road accident and same marked as a write off”, stated the ruling.

While disputing involvement in illegal trade on wildlife trophies , they termed the same as trumped up allegations and charges without cogent evidence and they had no relationship with acquisition of their property before July 2018 when those claims were made.

They also stated that they have been engaging in legitimate importation , wholesale and retail business of high beverages including alcohol and attached copies copies of cheques showing various bank slips made to the banks by customers and clients among others.

The Assets Recovery Agency in their response filed replying affidavit by Police Investigating officer dealing with offences relating to Narcotics and wildlife crimes under the proceeds of crime and Money laundering Act Fredrick Muriuki saying a team officers from DCI arrested Joseph Wanjohi and his wife  Jane Wambui Wanjiru who were suspected to be dealing with in illicit trade in wildlife trophies and narcotics and during the search , they recovered from their bedroom four elephant tusks worthybKshs. 700,000 sealed in a cello tape, cash 469,000 and assorted alcoholic drinks worth 700,000 which they suspected were illegally obtained.

IO Muriuki further added that they were charged with Criminal case Number 9 of 2018 at Jomo Kenyatta International Airport Magistrate Court and later received information that they had acquired massive wealth or assets using proceeds obtained from illegitimate trade of wildlife trophies and narcotics drugs thus offending the provisions of proceeds of Crime abd Anti-Money laundering Act 2009.

The agency through Senior Assistant State Counsel Adow Mohammad added that after investigators analysed the bank accounts in question, they revealed massive suspicious cash deposits made in the transaction below 1 million a deliberate attempt to evade detection of money laundering by CBK and they had reasonable cause to believe that the money was acquired through criminal activities and properties like motor vehicles and land were products of illegal commercial activities in this cade wildlife trophies and trade in narcotics.

Mr Adow added that the undue suffered by the couple as a result of the orders was only two accounts that were affected and the other three containing a total amount of Kshs. 341,455 are not affected and they can survive on the same

He further added that the period of preservation orders had not expired and they were in the process of filing forfeiture proceedings.

LAWYER NYAKUNDI’S WIFE SEEKS TO BLOCK HUSBAND’S INTENDED MURDER CHARGE.

0
City lawyer Assa Nyakundi before Makandara Law Courts on Thursday April 25,2019.

BY SAM ALFAN.

City lawyer Assa Nyakundi’s wife, Lydia Kung’a has moved to the High Court seeking to stay a decision by Director of public prosecution (DPP) Noordin Haji to withdraw manslaughter charges against her husband.

In her application filed under certificate of urgency through lawyer Danstan Omari Kung’a also wants the court to bar DPP, Director of Criminal Investigations George Kinoti and Chief Magistrate at Kiambu law court from preferring other charges against her husband relating to the shooting of their late son, Joseph Bongoko Nyakundi pending the hearing of the application.

Kung’a through lawyer Danstan Omari is seeking the orders on grounds that she was not involved when the state made the application to withdraw the manslaughter charges against her husband.

“Without my involvement or the consideration of the families views, the DPP, DCI and the trial court have violated my rights as a victim to be fully involved and informed about the case before court,” she claims.

Kung’a is further seeking a declaration that her role as a victim is active and includes the right to be informed of any action by the respondents (DPP, DCI and Kiambu magistrate court) desire to take in any criminal proceedings preferred against the accused person in the murder of her son.

“Unless this court moves with speed and protects the applicant (Lydia Kung’a) and the rest of the victims, the respondent will continue to politicize and lead to the over publication of information without the victims involvement or consideration of their feelings,” reads the court papers.

She is also seeking orders to quash the decision by the Kiambu court allowing the DPP to unilaterally, whimsically and arbitrary withdrawal of the manslaughter charges against the lawyer.

The applicant further wants the court to call for proceedings before the Kiambu Magistrate’s court for the purpose of making further orders and directions as it considers appropriate to ensure the fair administration of justice.

“A declaration that the DPP and DCI actions of revealing and disclosing her name and that of her son as witnesses for the state is inimical to section 8 of the Victim Protection Act,” she states.

Kung’a further claims that high ranking officers from the offices of the DPP and DCI have even gone to an extent of making public announcements through their constant interactions with the media that herself and his son-Noah Nyakundi are among the key prosecution witnesses, a fact that is hostile to the Victim protection’s Act.

According to the court papers, Kung’a says that on the March 17, 2019 she regrettably learnt from her husband lawyer that he had accidentally shot their son Joseph Bogonko and was rushing him to Aga Khan Hospital for specialized treatment, care and attention.

She further adds that she left the Mater Hospital where she had gone to visit a friend’s son who had been admitted therein and proceeded to Aga Khan Hospital where she was met with the devastating news about the demise of his beloved son

The application by Kung’a comes just a day after the DPP urged Kiambu law court to drop manslaughter charges against Nyakundi.

The DPP’s decision to withdraw the charges comes after DCI boss Kinoti disowned a manslaughter charge against Nyakundi.

Kinoti later interdicted two police officers assigned to probe the killing of Joseph Bogonko.

According to Kinoti, he says that they were not briefed on the final investigation file that was eventually taken to court for the Manslaughter charge.

He also says that the two senior officers alongside two prosecutors allegedly engaged in a “cover up” of the case which they believe there is overwhelming evidence to have a murder charge leveled against Nyakundi.

Nyakundi was charged with manslaughter last week on Friday at a Kiambu Court, after staying in Nariobi hospital for nearly two months after arrest over his son’s killing.

He is accused of shooting Joseph Bogonko his last born to death in what he claimed was an accidental shooting.

The city lawyer is accused of killing his 29-year-old son shortly after they left International Christian Centre along Mombasa Road on March 17.

Nyakundi has since dined the manslaughter charge and is out on a cash bail of Sh 300,000 or a bond of Sh 1 million pending the hearing on the case.

Justice John Makau directed lawyer Omari to serve DPP ,DCI and Kiambu Chief Magistrate Court and appear in court on May 7 for further directions.

FIVE DENY BARCLAYS BANK ATM HEIST.

0
Police officers George Gachungui Njoroge, John Otieno Makambogo ,Frederick Herman Otiya and Daniel Orero Okindo before Nairobi Court on Thursday May 2,2019./PHOTO BY S.A.N.

BY NT CORRESPONDENT.

Two police officers, two G4S security guards and a taxi driver have been charged with the recent theft of money from several ATMs at Barclays Bank.

Police officers George Gachungui Njoroge, John Otieno Makambogo ,Frederick Herman Otiya and Daniel Orero Okindo who work as guards for G4S are accused of stealing Sh2,840,000 from Barclays Bank ATM at Kenya Cinema along Moi Avenue in Nairobi.

The four are alleged to have committed the offence on April 16, 2019 jointly with others not before court. The accused persons are also charged with conspiracy to commit a felony, namely stealing.

Patrick Wanyoike Karanja, a taxi driver is charged with stealing Sh1 million from the Bank’s ATM at Matter hospital in Nairobi.

The five denied the offence when they appeared before Senior Principal Magistrate Kenneth Cheruiyot. The court released them on cash bail of Sh500,000 each of alternative bond Sh2 million.

The case will be heard on June 5.

FORMER ANTI-GRAFT CZAR SLAPPED WITH SH27 MILLION FOR DEFAMATION IN ANGLO LEASING CASE.

0
Former Ethics and Governance Permanent Secretary, John Githongo before Justice Sergon where he was being cross-examination by veteran lawyer Kioko Kilukumi for former minister Dr Chris Murungaru who has sued Githongo for defamation on Monday February 20 ,2017.

BY SAM ALFAN.

Former Anti-graft czar has suffered a major blow as the High Court ordered him to pay former powerful security Cabinet minister Chris Murungaru Sh27 million for defamation.

Justice Joseph Sergon ordered John Githongo to pay 20 million for damages, 5 million aggravated damages and 2 million exemplary damages and the amount to attract interests at court rates from today until full settlement.

“Having considered the rival proposals on damages and having taken into account the authorities cited, i am convinced that in both circumstances of this case the plaintiff (Chris Murungaru) should be awarded both general, aggravated and punitive damages”, ruled Judge Sergon.

The learned judge in his 29 judgement ruled that from evidence presented in court John Githongo intended to have the publication to be intensive, global in nature, with intensity and it appeared he wanted to inflict maximum damages to the former Kieni Member of Parliament.

Dr Murungaru had proposed to be paid 100 million for both general, aggravated and exemplary damages  arguing that the intensity and worldwide scope of the publication is unrivaled. He further added that its dissemination was carefully planned and executed to inflict maximum damages to his reputation.

Murungaru testified that on November 22,2005 , John Githongo published and caused to be published a report or a statement which was referred to by print and electronic media as ” The Githongo Dossier” ostensibly addressed to former president Mwai Kibaki.

He claimed that upon reading the aforementioned report and words or statements, he was mentally anguished at adverse , malicious and baseless reference made on him and the publication caused consternation and anxiety among his constituents , family, friends , clergy and business.

The former minister further stated that the publication bwas not founded by any evidence linking him to corrupt dealings but instead the words consist of a pack of falsehoods , rumors , gossips and hearsay.

GITHONGO WAS KEY TO “THE KIAMBU MAFIA”.

Former president Mwai Kibaki did not act on a report prepared by ant graft czar, John Githongo who had exposed the controversial Anglo-Leasing scandal.


The court also heard that Githongo did not act on a request made to him by former Chairman of the defunct Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission (KACC) boss, retired Appellate Judge Aaron Ringera, who had invited him to shed light into the corruption saga.The Anglo-Leasing scandal had at the time, shocked the country, and caused several senior state officials to resign.Githongo had resigned on February 2, 2005, while on an official trip to London that had started on January 24, 2005.

He had sent his dossier to then President Kibaki on November 22, 2005, long after he had quit the civil service but no action was taken despite public uproar, he told High Court Judge Joseph Sergon.

The former PS said he had met former Energy minister Simeon Nyachae on October 20, 2014, and discussed high-level corruption that had permeated Kibaki’s administration. Murungaru and some of his Cabinet colleagues were allegedly involved in a mission to secure Sh5 billion from corrupt activities for political campaign purposes, he said.

The former PS recalled that the special audit report by the Auditor-General dated April 10, 2006, relating to the 18 contentious government contracts did not specifically identify Dr Murungaru as a suspect in corrupt dealings.

There existed no tape recording of his conversations with Dr Murungaru relating to the contracts, he said.

Githongo was put to task over his assertion that Dr Murungaru had orchestrated his transfer from State House to the ministry of Justice and Constitutional Affairs over his active involvement in the war against corruption.

NLC OFFICIALS FAIL IN BID TO STOP INVESTIGATIONS BY EACC.

0
former National Land Commission Muhammad Swazuri with his co-accused before Milimani Anti-Corruption Court .
BY SAM ALFAN.

High Court has dismissed a petition by two officials of the National Land Commission (NLC) who sought protection from the court accusing the anti-graft body of harassment.

Dr Salome Munubi, a director valuation and taxation at NLC and her deputy Joash Oindo filed the application before the High Court accusing Ethics and Anti-Commission (EACC) of victimization, intimidation and harassment them and their families in the guise of carrying out investigations.

Oindo also sought to be reinstated back to his job, alleging that he was “forced” to go on compulsory leave with giving him a hearing.

The two claimed that investigations into compensation of the standard gauge railway (SGR), Port Reitz/Moi International Airport access road and for Mombasa Southern by-pass-Kipevu road are in bad faith and have not been a genuine effort towards the enforcement of the Anti- Corruption and Economics Crimes Act.

But after hearing the case, Justice Mumbi Ngugi of Anti-Corruption division said she cannot stop an investigative agency from carrying out its mandate. “They may also view the acts of the respondents as harassment.

However, I do not believe that a court can properly restrain a state investigative agency form carrying out its constitutional mandate only because it is causing harassment and embarrassment to the applicants,” the Judge said.

She added that the two must demonstrate that they are likely to suffer real prejudice, an element they were unable to demonstrate.

The court also dismissed an application seeking to compel EACC to produce a CCTV footage of an interview conducted by the commission and Mr Oindo as well as documents confiscated from their homes.