Blog Page 380

PROSECUTION GIVEN LAST ADJOURNMENT IN DUBAI BANK CASE.

0

????????????????????????????????????

Dubai Bank directors Abdul Zubeidi and Professor Wilson Naadwa who are facing money laundering charges outside Milimani law courts building on Tuesday October 11, 2016.

BY SAM ALFAN.

Dubai Bank directors facing money laundering charges have accused the prosecution for delaying the hearing of their case.

The three former managers Abdul Hafedh Zubeidi, Ali iBashir Sheikh and Professor Wilson Hassan Nandwa argue that the actions by the  prosecution to continuously adjourn the matter  is unfair and  keeps on infringing their right to a fair trial.

Their lawyer Abdallah Busaidy requested the court to dismiss the case claiming that the prosecution has failed to prove the case against them.

However the prosecution defended itself saying that the matter is being delayed by the Investigation Officer who has failed to bond witnesses to appear in court and testify.

Chief Magistrate Daniel Ogembo said the defense having not opposed previous adjournment applications by the prosecution; he will allow the prosecution the last adjournment.

“I will reluctantly grant the prosecution the last adjournment because they have sought for adjournment on several occasions unopposed,” said Ogembo.

The accused are said to have transferred over 12 million Shillings from the bank through a dummy company Runway Entertainment private limited in 2014.

The prosecution alleges that the trio knew the money was stolen from the bank through a process intended to conceal the origin of the money.

The Central Bank of Kenya placed Dubai Bank under receivership in August last year on grounds that there were serious cases of parallel banking, interference with client accounts and a large number of unsecured loans.

The three also face another count of failing to comply with the provisions of section 45 (i) of the Proceeds of Crime and Anti Money Laundering Act 2009.

All pleaded not guilty and were released on a cash bail of Sh3 million shillings each.

 

POLICE WANTS MOTHER AND DAUGHTER TO TESTIFY IN HIS MURDER CASE.

0

Lawyer Cliff Ombeta with police officer Titus Musila, alias Katitu who is alleged to have killed Kenneth Kimani and Oscar Muchoki in September 2014 outside Milimani law court’s on Tuesday October 11, 2016(PHOTO BY SAM ALFAN).

Lawyer Cliff Ombeta with police officer Titus Musila, alias Katitu who is alleged to have killed Kenneth Kimani and Oscar Muchoki in September 2014 outside Milimani law court’s on Tuesday October 11, 2016(PHOTO BY SAM ALFAN).

BY SAM ALFAN.

The prosecution has closed its case against a Githurai police officer charged with the murder of two brothers two years ago.

According to the prosecution, police officer Titus Musila, alias Katitu is alleged to have killed Kenneth Kimani and Oscar Muchoki in September, 2014.

Out of 22 witnesses only 18 stood at the witness dock to testify against Mr Katitu.

The court heard those two witnesses, the mother and sister to the deceased are in Norway and attempts to have them testify in the case have been futile.

State prosecutor Catherine Mwaniki said that the statements of the two cannot be produced in court since they were not present during the incident adding that they were just informed.

“Evidence produced in court by the 18 prosecution witnesses is sufficient to stand in for the two witnesses who are in Norway,” Ms Mwaniki.

The defense however insists that the two witnesses are key in the case since they will help them know the characters of the two deceased persons.

The defense case is that the two brothers were thieves who used to terrorize people in Githurai 45, Zimmerman and Githurai Kimbo.  The defense further claims that Mr Kimani was shot dead after he snatched a phone from a passenger who was in a matatu.

The court will make its ruling on November 3, this year on whether the two will testify or not.

Constable Katitu’s arrest and prosecution provoked a three-day protest on the Thika Superhighway by residents, who demanded his immediate and unconditional release.

 

ODM SEEKS ITS SH5BILLION SHARE OF THE POLITICAL PARTIES’ FUND.

0

or

Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) lawyer James Orengo making submissions during the hearing of an application seeking Sh5 billion from the Registrar of Political Parties.

BY SAM ALFAN.

Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) has filed an application seeking Sh5 billion from the Registrar of Political Parties and the Treasury.

ODM has in the court papers claimed that the Registrar of Political Parties and the Treasury have acted unprocedurally by failing to consult, inform or give any reasons for not disbursing or distributing all the funds expected to be distributed to the political parties entitled to receive funding from the Political Parties Fund.

The party claims that it has been unable to undertake its core mandate to achieve its objectives because of underfunding.

“The next general election is barely a year away and ODM’s ability to prepare and participate meaningfully and effectively is greatly affected by the lack of funding,” the party through its lawyer James Orengo argues.

The party through its Executive Director Oduor Ong’wen, said that it had a legitimate expectation that it shall receive all the funds due to it from the Political Parties Fund.

“Following the results of the last General Election held in 2013, ODM is one of the three parties that are entitled to receive proportionate funding from the Political Parties Fund having met the criteria established under the Act,” Mr Ong’wen.

He said ODM is entitled to receive at least 40 percent of the funds to be distributed to political parties from the Political Parties Fund.

The party says it has not received any amount and wants the court to compel the Registrar of Political Parties and Treasury to disburse the sum of 5,109,564,700, since the fund was established.

Jubilee Party, National Alliance Party and United Republican Party have been named as interested parties.

 

MALINDI HOSPITAL DOCTOR DETAINED FOR THREE DAYS OVER TERRORISM LINKS.

0

isis

Terror suspect Allin Abdigan a doctor attached at Malindi General Hospital who is suspected to to a member of cartel of terror gang suspected of planning to launch a terror attack through anthrax attacks at Milimani law court on Monday October 10, 2016.

BY SAM ALFAN.

A Nairobi court has detained a terror suspect linked to ISIS for three days to allow police complete investigations.

Senior Principal magistrate P.M. Mugure allowed police to continue holding Allin Abdigan,a doctor attached at Malindi General Hospital who is suspected to be part of a cartel of terror gang suspected of planning to launch a terror attack through anthrax attacks in the country.

The prosecution told the court that that the doctor is alleged to be involved in several terror activities and police need more time to complete investigation into the matter.

The court heard that the suspect was arrested on October 7 in Malindi sub-county hospital before being flown to Nairobi to Anti- Terrorism Police Unit and police needed more time to investigate his phone and other crucial materials before pressing terrorism related charges against him.

The court was told that police need more time to complete investigation into the matter saying that the accused was arrested in Malindi and need more time to investigate his phone and other crucial materials before pressing terrorism related charges.

The investigator further alleges that the suspect had been on the run since August, when two interns at the hospital were arrested over alleged links with a terrorist group.

The matter will be mentioned on October 13 for further directions.

THREE NURSES AND KNH STAFF DENY KILLING CANCER PATIENT.

0

????????????????????????????????????

Geoffrey Mureithi, Priscilla Wairimu, Rosemary Nkonge and Mary Muthoni who denied charges of killing Cosmas Mutunga before High court criminal division at Milimani law court on Monday October 11,2016.

BY NT REPORTER.

Three nurses and a KNH cleaner have been charged with the murder of cancer patient

Geoffrey Mureithi, Priscilla Wairimu, Rosemary Nkonge and Mary Muthoni were accused of killing Cosmas Mutunga on November 29, 2015.

The man who was admitted on November 8 was found with several stab wounds and his eye gouged out. His right leg was also broken between the knee and the ankle.

The DPP asked the court for five days to place key witnesses under the victim’s protection program before the accused apply for bail.

This followed investigations into the death of 42-year old cancer patient Cosmas Mutunga on November 29, 2015.

The management of Kenyatta National Hospital was pushed in September to give a public report on internal investigations concerning Mutunga’s death.

The accused will be detained at the Lang’ata and Industrial Area prisons.

Hearing for bail application is fixed for March 6 and 9, 2017.

PROFESSOR THAIRU QUITS AS CHAIRMAN OF CUE.

0

bbbbbb

Lawyer Ham Lagat with Felix Kiprono Mategei  with who moved to court seeking Professor Henry Thairu resignation as the Chairman of Commission for University Education at Milimani law courts (FILE PHOTO)

BY SAM ALFAN.

Professor Henry Moses Thairu has succumbed to pressure to exit Commission for University Education.

Nairobi Times has learnt the professor has tendered his resignation as the Chairman of Commission for University Education.

In his letter seen by Nairobi TIMES dated 6th October 2016 addressed to Education Cabinet Secretary Fred Matiangi says he has obeyed the court order issued on 30th of September by the High Court.

“Following the Court order issued on 30th September 2016, by the High Court of Kenya, I hereby submit my letter of resignation as Chairman Commission for University Education with immediate effect “says Proffer in his letter.

Lawyer Ham lagat who was for petitioner Felix Kiprono welcomed Prof Thairu terming the decision as proper.

“The resignation is proper. He has obeyed a court order and bowed out honourable..“ The consequence could be much harsh if he wouldn’t have resigned” law Lagat told Nairobi TIMES.

Lawyer Felix Kiprono who moved to court seeking High court to compel Professor Henry Thairu to resign as the Chairman of Commission for University Education welcomed Thairu decision.

“It heralds a good jurisprudence and good precedent to our public service” the locus classicus in the case is that there was connivance and conflict of interest by the said Prof Henry Moses Thairu” said lawyer Felix Kiprono.

High Court has ordered Professor Henry Thairu to resign as the Chairman of Commission for University Education on 30th September.

Justice Joseph Onguto directed Mr Thairu to resign with 10 days.

“The respondent shall within 10days of the date of this order being served upon him or the commission for University Education formally tenders his resignation from the position of lecturer and employee of Kenyatta University and any of its units including the Kenyatta University Consultancy Services Unit or as a chairperson of the Commission for University Commission” court ordered.

He was directed to file his resignation letter in court and with the Deputy Registrar within seven of the date of resignation.

The judge further ordered failure by Professor Henry Thairu tender his resignation as ordered by the court, his appointment as the chairperson of the Commission for University Education shall stand deemed null and void.

The commission was ordered to commence the process of appointing another chairperson of the Commission for University Education after Professor Henry exit.

Mr Onguto issued the orders on Friday following an application by lawyer Felix Mategei  accusing the professor of holding two public offices against the constitution as he was serving as a lecturer  at Thikaroad based University.

City Lawyer Felix Kiprono Mategei through his lawyer Ham Lagat told the court Thairu served the Commission for University Education while being a lecturer at Kenyatta University.

“Holding two offices at the CUE and KUSCSU was contrary to Article 73 of the constitution and that Prof Thairu has failed the test under leadership and integrity” argued Lagat

Arguing there was conflict of interest, the lawyer said Thairu was likely to be biased.

The judge also directed the chairman to file a compliance letter confirming his orders with the High Court Registrar.

 

FORMER CS NDEMO WAS SACRIFICIAL LAMB TO SHIELD REAL SUSPECTS, COURT RULES.

0

demo-u

Former Information permanent secretary Bitange Ndemo before Nairobi Anti-Corruption where he is was charged with the offense of willful failure to comply with procurement laws, abuse of office, stealing and conspiracy to commit a felony (FILE PHOTO).

BY SAM ALFAN.

High Court has stopped the prosecution of former Information permanent secretary Bitange Ndemo in the Sh179 million cases involving the purchase of Konza City land.

Justice Roselyn Aburil ruled that charges against Mr Ndemo were an abuse of the court process and discriminative.

The learned judge further concurred with Ndemo that he was used as a sacrificial lamb to shield the real suspects.

The former PS had moved in the High Court in April to stop his prosecution, claiming that it was based on malicious intent.

He had also argued that he was charged based on information found after the Director of Public Prosecutions had closed his file.

But the DPP had opposed his application claiming that evidence gathered proves that Ndemo fraudulently benefited from the illegal transaction.

Dr Ndemo was charged with the offense of wilful failure to comply with procurement laws, abuse of office, stealing and conspiracy to commit a felony.

Justice Aburili was told that it was clear from his statements and police investigations on the role he played in the transaction that he knew was unlawful and irregular.

He had denied charges of willful failure to comply with procurement laws, abuse of office, stealing and conspiracy to commit a felony in September 2014.

The offences were allegedly committed on June 7th 2009 at Teleposta through the signing of an agreement for the purchase of 5,000 acres from Malili Ranch Limited.

The former PS was accused alongside Machakos Senator Johnstone Muthama, former Lands Commissioner Zablon Agwata, Malili directors Julius Kilonza, Julius Nzioku and the National Police Service Commissioner Ronald Musengi.

 

 

MP OSCAR SUDI CHARGED WITH FORGING ACADEMIC CREDENTIAL.

0
Kapseret Member of Parliament Oscar Sudi before Nairobi Anti-corruption at Milimani Law Courts on Thursday October 6, 2016.(PHOTO BY SAM)
Kapseret Member of Parliament Oscar Sudi before Nairobi Anti-corruption at Milimani Law Courts on Thursday October 6, 2016.(PHOTO BY SAM)

BY SAM ALFAN.

Kapseret Member of Parliament Oscar Sudi has been charged before Nairobi Anti-corruption with nine counts of forgery on allegations that he forged a diploma certificate.

It is alleged that on an unknown date and place, with the intent to deceive, he forged a diploma certificate in business management, purporting that it had been issued by the Kenya Institute of Management.

The lawmaker has been released on a cash bail of Sh300, 000 or a bond of Sh600, 000.

The court heard that he committed the offence on January 31, 2013 at IEBC offices in Edoret, Uasin Gishu County.

It was said that Sudi’s forged documents included his Diploma Certificate in Business Management allegedly issued by Kenya Institute of Management and KCSE document from Highway High school.

The MP is facing other counts of giving false information to an officer of the IEBC and lying to the electoral body and the EACC.

He is said to have told the two commissions of the forged documents with the intention of deceiving them.

Sudi allegedly provided false information to Derrick Kaisha, an officer of EACC, at Haron Court Hotel, Nairobi County, in September 2015.

The legislator was also accused of making a false declaration under oath through a self-declaration form to IEBC at Barng’etuny plaza in Eldoret on that date.

This was contrary to Section 46(1)(d) as read with Section 46(2) at the Leadership and Integrity Act

He was further accused of making a false statutory declaration contrary to Section 11 of the Oaths and Statuary declarations.

Sudi was charged based on the EACC’s recommendations to the DPP, following investigations.

The MP denied all the charges before judge Lawrence Mugambi of Milimani Anti-corruption Court in Nairobi.

The case will be mentioned on October 19 to set a hearing date.

MCSK ORDERED TO PAY MUSICIANS THEIR DUES.

0

r

High Court Judge, Justice Fred Ochieng who compelled the Music Copyright Society of Kenya (MCSK) to pay a group of gospel artists their royalties as released by safaricom.

BY SAM ALFAN.

The High Court has compelled the Music Copyright Society of Kenya (MCSK) to pay a group of gospel artists their royalties as released by safaricom.

Justice Fred Ochieng issued the orders after 14 Musicians filed a case at the High Court claiming that MCSK has refused to release their dues.

Through lawyer Gikunda Miriti, the Musicians claimed that Safaricom has paid them their monies but MCSK is withholding holding it.

The musicians led by Peace Mulu the composer of “Ombea Adui yako and Lydia Joy Kairimu the composer of the song ‘Mungu najua haujanisahau’ say through MCSK, they were introduced to one company called Expedia, formerly Liberty Africa limited.

They claim that the Company was to give them the skiza codes to have their songs run as skiza tunes, a programme run by safaricom.

They would then be paid by safaricom through the company but since 2009, the musicians who according to data released by safaricom have been able to earn huge sums of money, said the money has not been released to them.

Appearing before Judge Ochieng, they were directed to go back to Judge Francis Toiyot because he is the one who issued first orders.

“The matter should be mentioned on Thursday, October 6, before judge Toiyot for further directions,” said Judge Ochieng’ on October 5.

The applicants through their lawyer David Gikunda Miriti said that even after an officer from the music copyright society Laz Muli came to court and promised to pay them, he has never done so.

Appearing before Judge Ochieng, the applicants said that the content service provider has maintained that they shall not pay the monies.

The musicians are expecting between one million to six million each.

Judge Ochieng also excused Laz Muli from attending the session but warned that action will be taken against him if he fails to honor his promise.

The judge also said the musicians must be paid their dues irrespective of who is paying as long as Safaricom has released the money.

 

 

 

COFEK HAS INITIATED LEGAL BATTLE WITH CBA BANK OVER M-SHWARI RATE.

0

pictures

M-shwari advert.

BY SAM ALFAN.

Consumers Federation of Kenya (COFEK) has initiated a legal battle with Commercial Bank of Africa for breaching the banking Act by charging higher rates in its Mshwari transactions.

COFEK claims that CBA through its loan transmitted via  mobile phones is charging  90 per cent instead of 14.5 per cent known under the banking Act.

The applicant through lawyer Henry Kurauka, says that it has issued press statements calling on CBA to adhere to the banking regulation but the same has been ignored.

The bank has maintained that it will not comply with the Banking Act 2016, saying that 7.5  per cent its  charging is not interest but facilitation fee.

The lawyer said that the partial compliance of the banking Act by CBA is occasioning deprivation of their clients’ money and cause suffering to many borrowers using the Mshwari product.

Both Central Bank of Kenya and CBA have conspired to abuse and contravene the provisions of Article 40 and 46 of the constitution, consumer’s products Act and the banking Act 2016, the applicant says.

“The continued denial of lower interest rate on Mpesa products hurts consumers and borrowers and the same should be halted by the court” lawyer said.

COFECK through its  officials Stephen  Mutoro, Ephaim Kanake and Henry Ochieng will at the hearing of the petition lodged at the High Court ask for a conservatory order to preventing CBA  under  the supervision of CBK from charging its Mshwari  consumers an interest rate on loans that is higher than  what  is permitted  under the banking Act.

The case will be heard on October 10.