SINAI FIRE VICTIMS DENIED SH25 BILLION BY COURT.

0
1385
Nairobi Senator Mike Sonko swearing on oath at Milimani law courts when he was testifying on a case which he filed seeking the compensation for Sinai fire victim that occurred on 12 September, 2011.

BY SAM ALFAN.

A quest by survivors of the Sinai fire tragedy to be given over Sh25 Billion by the government has been denied by court.

 

Instead, the court directed them to file a proper suit where they will claim for damages on personal injuries caused by the inferno in 2011

 

The court further ruled that the claimants are obliged to file a suit in negligence for recovery of damages where each claimant will have to each prove his individual loss in addition to establish the tests of liability with regard to breach of duty, causations and damages.

 

“It is unnecessary whether to decide whether the claimants may recover personal injury damages through a constitutional law as there is already a procedure in common law and statute through which he matter may be conveniently and full resolved. The court ruled that it is a matter of private civil law for damages for personal injury,” court ruled.

 

High court judge Edward Muriithi noted that the respondents who are involved in slum upgrading and relocating slum dwellers have to ensure that the persons living in the said slums settlements enjoy the rights to clean environment, health and housing in order to live in the dignity which is the object of constitutional guarantee.

 

“As part of that programme the persons living in the slums may be removed subject to adequate and reasonable notice, “judge Murithi ruled.

 

The respondents were also directed to include Sinai settlement as part of its Slum Upgrading and Prevention Programme with Liberty to relocate otherwise compensate the person’s resident therein order to clear the Kenya Pipeline wayleave.

 

In the meantime the respondent have been directed to provide such services to the persons resident in Sinai Slums as are necessary for the enjoyment of their rights to health , sanitation , adequate housing and dignity in accordance with the Urban Areas and Cities Act 2011.

 

More than a hundred people died in the slum fire on September 12, 2011 following an oil spill from the Kenya Pipeline Corporation pipes.

 

Over 300 residents drawn from Hazina, Mukuru Kayaba, Tetra Pack and Sinai stated how they have resided in the area for over 40 years and were victims of negligence by companies which do not want to follow industrial and NEMA laws.

 

Nairobi Senator Mike Sonko has told a Nairobi High Court that he has spent over Sh 4.9 million helping Sinai fire Victims who were affected by the fire.
Sonko told the court he doesn’t want any compensation for that money but he wants the Government to compensate the victims of 2011 Sinai Fire that left many disabled.
He further told the court that it was due to the negligence by the Kenya Pipeline Company that the fire occurred and destroyed the lives of so many victims who were left hopeless after the fire burnt everything.

 

Those sued include the Attorney General, Nairobi City County, Kenya Pipeline Company Limited (KPC), National Environmental Management Authority (NEMA) and the Kenya Railways Corporation (KR).

More than 100 people died in the slum fire on September 12, 2011, following an oil spill from the Kenya Pipeline Corporation.

On October 23, 2013, the survivors became anxious over delayed hearing of their compensation case despite filing all the necessary documents.

“The court misdirected itself on the underpin values and principals that inform Article 23 of the constitution. Lawyer Ondieki told Nairobi Times.

 

In  petition filed under Article 21 of the constitution the court has the power under Article 23(3) of the law ,high Court has a right to make a declaration that, declaration of rights,  an injunction, a conservatory order and an order for compensation which the defence team argued were not observed.
Speaking to Nairobi Times after the meeting to analyse the judgement with other defence they agreed to appeal high Court decision.
“We are appealing the court decision and we have already filed a notice to appeal before the appellate Court “said lawyer Ondieki.

LEAVE A REPLY